Re: Usage of Assembly
- From: "Ratch" <watchit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:23:27 -0600
"Betov" <betov@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XnF99F7DC64A8207betovfreefr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Ratch" <watchit@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait
news:domdnW7jWaXQktLanZ2dnUVZ_sSlnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx:
You really are dense Betov. What you say is irrevelant to the
definition of an assembler. If a processor has some limited or full
capability for HLL, that does disqualify it as being an assembler
unless that is the ONLY way it can write code. I believe that all
the processors that call themselves assemblers can write code on a
one to one basis, thereby enabling their code generation to be
exactly what the programmer intended. Supplemental HHL capability
does not disqualify them from being an assembler. Are you able to
understand that point?
No, you know... i am far too stupid, and as opposed to you,
i have done so much Asm, that my brain is now a bit special.
I too have done a lot of asm. So what? It is irrelevant. Your posts
seem to indicate that you don't know what an assembler is even though you
plug away at a who knows what code generating processor.
So, i have problems understanding people who talk about what
they utterly ignore.
You really mean what you ignore. You have still not addressed the
point I made about what constitutes an assembler. Ratch
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Usage of Assembly
- From: Betov
- Re: Usage of Assembly
- From: highdoe
- Re: Usage of Assembly
- References:
- Usage of Assembly
- From: Ratch
- Re: Usage of Assembly
- From: Betov
- Usage of Assembly
- Prev by Date: Re: Usage of Assembly
- Next by Date: Re: Which Assembler?
- Previous by thread: Re: Usage of Assembly
- Next by thread: Re: Usage of Assembly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|