Re: Which Assembler?
- From: "Ratch" <watchit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:29:25 -0600
"Wolfgang Kern" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fimf2k$70o$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ratch asked:
"Betov" wrote:...
The problem, when being late on an answer, is that it becomes more
and more difficult hide the reality, which is, for example, that
the OP might have already taken a look by himself, and seen that
RosAsm is the one and only Assembler, coming with an integrated
Source Level Debugger, dynamic break-points, memory scanner, and
all that stuff.
Doesn't matter what add-me-ons RosAsm (name stolen from another
development group) features. If it does not output exactly what the
programmer specifies, then it is not an assembler.
Can anyone tell me if his program does that? Ratch
RosAsm produces only the PE-header by itself, everthing else incl. the
decision for using HL-structs¯os is under control of the programmer.
And the often heard missing Link-feature in RosAsm is just valid for HLL
C-source LIBs, I don't have any problems to merge KESYS-produced binaries
into a RosAsm created executable.
Then it appears that RosAsm (name stolen from another development
group) is truly an assembler. Albeit not a very popular one. Ratch
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Usage of Assembly
- Next by Date: Sudoku
- Previous by thread: Usage of Assembly
- Next by thread: Sudoku
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
