Re: Nasm Error
- From: Betov <betov@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Nov 2007 19:36:28 GMT
Frank Kotler <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait news:5fO3j.21392$Jy1.10525
@trndny02:
Most of Nasm is designed to be OS-ignorant. The output "drivers",
outelf32.c and outelf64.c might be some help.
Unless I'm mistaken, the library is a bigger deal than the compiler.
Nasm uses only a small subset that cares about OS - open, read, write,
close, malloc, free.
Of course. For a Command-line tool, what else? The final demonstration
of the absurdity of writing an Assembler in C, as demonstrated, if this
would only be still required, by FASM, that does the exact same thing
in pure true Assembly, without any overhead, but to rewrite this small
and trivial OS related subset.
Betov.
< http://rosasm.org >
.
- References:
- Nasm Error
- From: fred smith
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: fred smith
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: fred smith
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: fred smith
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: Betov
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: Wolfgang Kern
- Re: Nasm Error
- From: Frank Kotler
- Nasm Error
- Prev by Date: Re: Usage of Assembly
- Next by Date: Re: Usage of Assembly
- Previous by thread: Re: Nasm Error
- Next by thread: Re: Nasm Error
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|