Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- From: Frank Kotler <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 16:35:30 GMT
Frank Kotler wrote:
Betov wrote:The problem is not with speed, nor size. It is with
readability. Recently shown C++ example:
NminusI = (i==0)? 0 : (N-i);
... meaning (we have been told):
If I = 0
NminusI = 0
Else NminusI = DN - I
End_If
I seriously doubt a beginner could understand the
first version, whereas i don't doubt that he could
understand quite easily the Assembly version, and
even more easily with a bit of If/Then/Else Macros.
cmp eax, byte 1
adc eax, byte -1
Where's the macro?
Sorry, I misread that... proving your point! I *knew* I shouldn't have had that last toke of mistletoe!
Best,
Frank
.
- References:
- Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee
- Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- From: santosh
- Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- From: Betov
- Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- Next by Date: Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- Next by thread: Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|