Re: COMPARE HLL/ASM
- From: "Wolfgang Kern" <nowhere@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 04:40:25 +0100
Charles Crayne wrote:
I think we've done something similar a few years ago.
Indeed we have. So let's try something a bit more modern this time:
1. The string encoding is UTF8.
2. The test strings will include non-ascii characters.
3. The routine is passed two parameters
A. A pointer to the UTF8 string
B. The physical length, in bytes, of the UTF8 string.
4. The routine must return the number of characters in the string.
Good idea, I might finally get a chance to figure what's UTF8 ... ;)
__
wolfgang
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: COMPARE HLL/ASM
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: COMPARE HLL/ASM
- References:
- Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- From: //\\\\o//\\\\annabee
- Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- From: santosh
- COMPARE HLL/ASM
- From: Wolfgang Kern
- Re: COMPARE HLL/ASM
- From: Charles Crayne
- Re: Is PSHUFW instruction MMX or SSE or SSE2? Is NASM manual correct?
- Prev by Date: Re: COMPARE HLL/ASM
- Next by Date: Re: COMPARE HLL/ASM
- Previous by thread: Re: COMPARE HLL/ASM
- Next by thread: Re: COMPARE HLL/ASM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|