Re: [OT] for the close of all fission nuclear reactor in the world

"Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:fpjlh6$fp9$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Rs" <a@xxx> wrote in message
news:47bc701e$0$4784$4fafbaef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
the governaments have to try a different model for the world
convivence - producht exange too


close of all fission nuclear reactor in the world

Could you explain your logic?

Nuclear reactors predominantly produce electricity in the US. As I see
things, if the US shutdown all nuclear reactors, which produce 20% of US
electricity, this would shift US electric energy demands to other major
fossil fuel sources, such as coal, which produces 51% of US electricity,
or
natural gas, which produces 17.5% of US electricity. Oil is heavily used
for transportation, but almost isn't used for electricity in the US (4% of
electric). Due to cost pressures, coal would be used. This 20% of
additional coal usage amounts to a 40% increase in coal usage. The
serious
producers of energy are fossil fuels which increase greenhouse gas
emissions, acid rain, toxic metals, and other particulates in the air or
environment. Supposedly, the greenhouse gases contribute to global
warming,
assuming we aren't seeing natural weather variation. Wind and
hydroelectric
aren't serious power producers here or yet. The only other serious
options
for electric energy are fusion reactors, black holes, undersea methane
hydrates, and geodynamo's. None of which have been perfected. The
methane
hydrate is a fossil fuel... and at the bottom of the sea. People fear
black
hole research will create of a black hole that will destroy the Earth.
Geodynamo's are under researched since they are about as close to a
"perpetual energy machine" as you can get.

my cousin
explain me that if one electric motor is turn
that produce electric power in the start then
the resistance stop the turn

Fusion reactors have the same
problem as hydrogen fuel-cells: hydrogen doesn't exist in a pristine state

problem is the increase of radiactivity in the world

on Earth. I.e., you must use large amounts energy to create pure hydrogen
only to convert it back to energy... Unless you are able to extract far
more energy from the hydrogen than used in creating the hydrogen, you
lose.
You also consume large quantities of hydrogen rich chemicals such as
water,
methane, or methane hydrate, etc. which are needed by humanity for many
other chemical products.

i think new batterys (hdrogen battery) and wind and sun (fotocellule) are
the answer
but possibly i'm wrong because i have drunk some rum

Rod Pemberton



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OT] for the close of all fission nuclear reactor in the world
    ... Nuclear reactors predominantly produce electricity in the US. ... this would shift US electric energy demands to other major ... aren't serious power producers here or yet. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: [OT] for the close of all fission nuclear reactor in the world
    ... Nuclear reactors predominantly produce electricity in the US. ... aren't serious power producers here or yet. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Xogen - clean water purficaction, free energy generator and home heating devices [2001]
    ... Water can be broken into Hydrogen and Oxygen using electricity. ... Although originally designed with energy production as the focus, ... and produces over 140 BTU's of heat in two minutes! ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Future Navy Will Be Nuclear
    ... when it comes down to it the sun is the only reliable power ... With catalysts created by an MIT chemist, sunlight can turn water into ... dominant source of energy. ... would yield fresh water as well as electricity. ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • eer
    ... Electronic electricity repository is an energy concept that aims to accumulate ... the plates *within a small perimeter* could be fashioned. ... In one sentence, I am saying that a very, very advanced capacitor is possible, ...
    (sci.materials)