Re: for the close of all fission nuclear reactor in the world

"Terence" <tbwright@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:034eaf8e-0ab9-4c39-821f-b10d9b37b1e6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And, I'm not sure that I like someone tinkering with the chemicals, or
reactions that are occuring in the sun... They have a natural balance.
Until we are able to test the effects of injecting the byproducts of
nuclear
fission into an active nuclear fusion process a on Earth, I'd prefer
nothing
be put into the sun.

Actually that's where we got on the Earth, all elements above Lithium,
from distant suns going nova before our own really switched on.

True.

Novas are not from getting high-mass nucleide rubbish dumped in them,

How do you know - since the situation doesn't occur naturally?

but from running out of hydrogen and helium.

Yes, but stars don't contain "high-mass nucleide rubbish" when they are
burning hydrogen and helium...

Dumping into the sun causes very high neutron radiation of the nuclear
rubbish, which in turn causes more and more stable products to form,
heading to iron silicon and carbon.

That's what worries me. You've created a situation which doesn't occur
naturally. So, there is no evidence in the Universe or Earthly test to
confirm your beliefs that it's safe. It took expert chemists decades to
figure out how "inert" CFC's where destroying the ozone... Why should we
accept expert physicists word on this issue? I.e., how do you know that the
reaction will stop with carbon? Sufficient energy and temperatures are
there that it could continue for numerous more stages, perhaps producing
something very massive far off the end of periodic table whose effects we'd
rather not have in our galaxy...


Rod Pemberton

.

Relevant Pages