Re: [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- From: "waves" <w@xxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:17:24 +0100
"[Jongware]" <IdontWantSpam@xxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:9853e$47c33815$5038a4b4$13793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's being done as we speak -- I think it's even with gamma rays. The
old way
but gamma rays, like neutrons, protons, alpha rays and beta rays can cause
cancer; radio waves seems not until now
was lethal to everything in its beam in a straight path. So now they
combine a
lot of non-lethal rays from different angles; on their crossing point,
everything is destroyed, and the other tissue is safe.
OTOH locating malignant tissue is not as simple as shown on the
television.
Theoretically, the resolution is that of individual hydrogen atoms (these
get
all excited by the NMR and output a distinct radio signal). The limiting
factor
is the amount of detectors to gather all that information -- /their/
resolution
is much lower, you can't "zoom in" on individual cells.
And you can't tell good from bad by just looking at the hydrogen.
[Jw]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- From: santosh
- Re: [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- References:
- [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- From: waves
- Re: [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- From: [Jongware]
- [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- Prev by Date: Re: pushf v rcl, save, restore carry flag
- Next by Date: Re: [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- Previous by thread: Re: [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- Next by thread: Re: [OT] could it to be a good idea?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|