Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- From: tin.cans.and.string@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 06:45:59 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 19, 11:38 pm, Chuck Crayne <ccra...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They are components of the sparms field, which is pointed to by the ecx
register. The association is done with a technique in Fasm which may
have to be changed a bit if you are using some other assembler.
Ah. I'm using NASM.
Specifically, Fasm allows the following declaration,
virtual at sparms
p0 dd ?
p1 dd ?
p2 dd ?
p3 dd ?
p4 dd ?
p5 dd ?
end virtual
which is similar to a union or common declaration.
This is fantastic information, Chuck. Thanks again.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- From: Chuck Crayne
- Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- References:
- Port binding under linux in ASM
- From: tin . cans . and . string
- Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- From: Chuck Crayne
- Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- From: tin . cans . and . string
- Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- From: tin . cans . and . string
- Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- From: tin . cans . and . string
- Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- From: Chuck Crayne
- Port binding under linux in ASM
- Prev by Date: Re: All is right !
- Next by Date: Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- Previous by thread: Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- Next by thread: Re: Port binding under linux in ASM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|