alt.lang.asm

• Date Index

• Why use the C language?, rio
  • Re: Why use the C language?, santosh
  • Re: Why use the C language?, Alexei A. Frounze
    • Re: Why use the C language?, rio
      • Re: Why use the C language?, rio
      • Re: Why use the C language?, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: Why use the C language?, rio
      • Re: Why use the C language?, Alexei A. Frounze
  • Re: Why use the C language?, rio
    • Re: Why use the C language?, rio
• ch 4, ronaldsorrell2005
  • Re: ch 4, Herbert Kleebauer
    • Re: ch 4, Frank Kotler
      • Re: ch 4, rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: ch 4, Frank Kotler
      • Re: ch 4, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: ch 4, Frank Kotler
  • Re: ch 4, rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
• Call memory reference - NASM - x86, Stéphane thibaud
  • Re: Call memory reference - NASM - x86, H. Peter Anvin
    • Re: Call memory reference - NASM - x86, Stéphane thibaud
      • Re: Call memory reference - NASM - x86, H. Peter Anvin
• mov gs, edi - is it safe/supported?, James Harris
  • Re: mov gs, edi - is it safe/supported?, Wolfgang Kern
    • Re: mov gs, edi - is it safe/supported?, James Harris
      • Re: mov gs, edi - is it safe/supported?, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: mov gs, edi - is it safe/supported?, H. Peter Anvin
  • Re: mov gs, edi - is it safe/supported?, H. Peter Anvin
    • Re: mov gs, edi - is it safe/supported?, James Harris
• qsort, rio
• Asm books for sale in Uk., jhon smith
• Declare data - NASM, Stéphane thibaud
  • Re: Declare data - NASM, Alexei A. Frounze
    • Re: Declare data - NASM, Stéphane thibaud
• JWasm v1.8, japheth
  • Re: JWasm v1.8, Frank Kotler
    • Re: JWasm v1.8, japheth
      • Re: JWasm v1.8, Frank Kotler
      • Re: JWasm v1.8, japheth
• Opening for Process Engineer @ Pune, arundathi . vishwanath
• NASM-options?, Wolfgang Kern
  • Re: NASM-options?, H. Peter Anvin
    • Re: NASM-options?, Benjamin David Lunt
      • Re: NASM-options?, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM-options?, Benjamin David Lunt
      • Re: NASM-options?, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM-options?, H. Peter Anvin
      • Re: NASM-options?, Benjamin David Lunt
      • Re: NASM-options?, H. Peter Anvin
      • Re: NASM-options?, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM-options?, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: NASM-options?, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM-options?, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: NASM-options?, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM-options?, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM-options?, Benjamin David Lunt
      • Re: NASM-options?, Johannes Kroll
      • Re: NASM-options?, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM-options?, Benjamin David Lunt
      • Re: NASM-options?, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM-options?, Benjamin David Lunt
      • Re: NASM-options?, Johannes Kroll
      • Re: NASM-options?, Frank Kotler
  • Re: NASM-options?, rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: NASM-options?, Benjamin David Lunt
    • Re: NASM-options?, Frank Kotler
• a compainion book for aoa?, ronaldsorrell2005
  • Re: a compainion book for aoa?, santosh
  • Re: a compainion book for aoa?, Wolfgang Kern
    • Re: a compainion book for aoa?, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: a compainion book for aoa?, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: a compainion book for aoa?, Frank Kotler
      • Re: a compainion book for aoa?, Evenbit
      • Battleships - was:: a compainion book for aoa?, Frank Kotler
      • Re: Battleships - was:: a compainion book for aoa?, Evenbit
    • Re: a compainion book for aoa?, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: a compainion book for aoa?, Wolfgang Kern
• HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., chrisbdaemon
  • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., santosh
  • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., Herbert Kleebauer
    • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., Frank Kotler
      • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., santosh
      • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., Frank Kotler
    • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., chrisbdaemon
      • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., Frank Kotler
      • Re: HLA compilation fails with no obvious errors., chrisbdaemon
• Nasm 2.03.01 released, Frank Kotler
• Re: howto: MOV EAX, <64bit value> ?, nbaker2328
  • Re: howto: MOV EAX, <64bit value> ?, Wolfgang Kern
    • Re: howto: MOV EAX, <64bit value> ?, Evenbit
      • Re: howto: MOV EAX, <64bit value> ?, Wolfgang Kern
• set up hla on vista, ronaldsorrell2005
  • Re: set up hla on vista, Frank Kotler
    • Re: set up hla on vista, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: set up hla on vista, Evenbit
      • Re: set up hla on vista, santosh
      • Re: set up hla on vista, Evenbit
      • Re: set up hla on vista, Frank Kotler
      • Re: set up hla on vista, rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: set up hla on vista, Frank Kotler
• Memory behaves strangely between 0x500 and 0x7C00, but not in Bochs (x86), Stéphane thibaud
• hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
  • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Frank Kotler
    • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Evenbit
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Evenbit
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Evenbit
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Phil Carmody
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, H. Peter Anvin
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Phil Carmody
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Bill Leary
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • CORRECTION: Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, Wolfgang Kern
    • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, santosh
  • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, NathanCBaker
    • Re: hla set up for the art of assembly, ronaldsorrell2005
• Re: A20 line detection, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
  • Re: A20 line detection, H. Peter Anvin
    • Re: A20 line detection, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: NASM 2.03rc8 -- hopefully final revision before 2.03 final, Frank Kotler
  • Re: NASM 2.03rc8 -- hopefully final revision before 2.03 final, cr88192
    • Re: NASM 2.03rc8 -- hopefully final revision before 2.03 final, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 2.03rc8 -- hopefully final revision before 2.03 final, H. Peter Anvin
      • Re: NASM 2.03rc8 -- hopefully final revision before 2.03 final, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 2.03rc8 -- hopefully final revision before 2.03 final, H. Peter Anvin
• Randy??? :), Evenbit
  • Re: Randy??? :), Frank Kotler
    • Re: Randy??? :), Frank Kotler
      • Re: Randy??? :), NathanCBaker
      • Re: Randy??? :), santosh
  • Message not available
    • Re: reboot to update - clears data - bad OS design?, rio
      • Re: reboot to update - clears data - bad OS design?, rio
      • Re: reboot to update - clears data - bad OS design?, Wolfgang Kern
• asm + memory in windows, rio
  • Re: asm + memory in windows, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: asm + memory in windows, hutch--
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, santosh
    • Re: asm + memory in windows, Evenbit
    • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, santosh
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, s_dubrovich
  • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
  • Re: asm + memory in windows, Frank Kotler
    • Re: asm + memory in windows, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, Evenbit
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, Wolfgang Kern
    • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
  • Re: asm + memory in windows, Evenbit
    • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, Evenbit
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, Evenbit
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
      • Re: asm + memory in windows, rio
• HAY ROD, have you got that Ukelele yet ?, hutch--
• Free assembler for x86-64bit processors, pickett . aaron
  • Re: Free assembler for x86-64bit processors, cr88192
  • Re: Free assembler for x86-64bit processors, James Van Buskirk
    • Re: Free assembler for x86-64bit processors, Evenbit
      • Re: Free assembler for x86-64bit processors, James Van Buskirk
  • Re: Free assembler for x86-64bit processors, H. Peter Anvin
• Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Terence
  • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, hutch--
    • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Rod Pemberton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Terence
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Frank Kotler
    • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Frank Kotler
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, hutch--
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, hutch--
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Frank Kotler
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Frank Kotler
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, hutch--
      • Re: Aw, hutch-- is mad again... or, will OZ survive?, Robert Redelmeier

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint