alt.lang.asm

• Date Index

---

• calling windows syscalls from gnu assembler, shikamuk
  • Re: calling windows syscalls from gnu assembler, NathanCBaker
• question on MIPS: addiu, Keep Asking
  • Message not available
    • Re: question on MIPS: addiu, Keep Asking
      • Re: question on MIPS: addiu, Harold Aptroot
      • Re: question on MIPS: addiu, cr88192
• Re: What about SystemA() [the function for call programs] function?, rio
• Mips code, shane
• announce: crudcom2 (the crude decompiler) now available, with full GPL'd source code, Willow
  • Message not available
    • Re: announce: crudcom2 (the crude decompiler) now available, with full GPL'd source code, Willow
• delete "0D", J.Dorval
  • Message not available
    • Re: delete "0D", Robert Redelmeier
  • Re: delete "0D", Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
    • Re: delete "0D", J.Dorval
      • Re: delete "0D", Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
      • Message not available
      • Re: delete "0D", Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
      • Re: delete "0D", Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: delete "0D", Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: delete "0D", Frank Kotler
  • Re: delete "0D", Almas
• Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!, Frank Kotler
  • Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!, japheth
    • Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!, Frank Kotler
      • Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!, japheth
      • Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!, Frank Kotler
• Re: a little program for format asm code, Frank Kotler
  • Re: a little program for format asm code, rio
    • Re: a little program for format asm code, Frank Kotler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a little program for format asm code, rio
• NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
  • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
  • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
    • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, NathanCBaker
    • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Phil Carmody
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Nathan Baker
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, NathanCBaker
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: Windela, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, NathanCBaker
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM preprocessor, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Intel illogical syntax..., Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Intel illogical syntax..., rio
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Robert Redelmeier
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Robert Redelmeier
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, rio
      • Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD, Rod Pemberton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Message not available
      • Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Martin Str|mberg
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Martin Str|mberg
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Herbert Kleebauer
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Rod Pemberton
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, NathanCBaker
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, NathanCBaker
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Robert Redelmeier
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Chuck Crayne
      • Message not available
      • Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly, Frank Kotler
• Linux News Reader., Betov
  • Re: Linux News Reader., santosh
  • Re: Linux News Reader., Frank Kotler
  • Re: Linux News Reader., Robert Redelmeier
    • Re: Linux News Reader., Betov
• add New 'macro' for stack and address?, rio
  • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, NathanCBaker
    • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, rio
      • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, rio
      • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, rio
      • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, NathanCBaker
  • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, Wolfgang Kern
    • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, rio
      • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, NathanCBaker
      • Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?, rio
• announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
  • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
    • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
  • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Alexei A. Frounze
  • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
  • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Karel Lejska
    • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Dave -Turner
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Karel Lejska
  • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Herbert Kleebauer
    • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Nathan Baker
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Frank Kotler
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Chuck Crayne
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Frank Kotler
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
  • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Rod Pemberton
    • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Rod Pemberton
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Rod Pemberton
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), NathanCBaker
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Rod Pemberton
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Rod Pemberton
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), H. Peter Anvin
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), H. Peter Anvin
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Alexei A. Frounze
      • Message not available
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Alexei A. Frounze
      • Message not available
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Willow
      • Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL), Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: time to leave?, NathanCBaker
  • Re: time to leave?, santosh
    • Re: time to leave?, NathanCBaker
  • Re: time to leave?, Wolfgang Kern
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: time to leave?, Betov
    • Re: time to leave?, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: time to leave?, Betov
      • Re: time to leave?, Wolfgang Kern
• Startup routine initialization, Sharwan
  • Re: Startup routine initialization, Frank Kotler
• Re: I pee in the open, NathanCBaker
• Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, rio
  • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, NathanCBaker
    • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Wolfgang Kern
      • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Betov
      • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, NathanCBaker
      • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Betov
      • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Nathan Baker
      • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Betov
  • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Alexei A. Frounze
  • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Wolfgang Kern
  • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, JC
    • Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?, Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Vectors (cpu type idea), Wolfgang Kern
  • Re: Vectors (cpu type idea), NathanCBaker
• OT/hypothetical: dot-matrix style ion-beam lithography, cr88192
  • Re: OT/hypothetical: dot-matrix style ion-beam lithography, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: OT/hypothetical: dot-matrix style ion-beam lithography, cr88192

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(15)