alt.lang.asm

• Thread Index

---

• Re: question on MIPS: addiu
  • From: cr88192
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: calling windows syscalls from gnu assembler
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: NathanCBaker
• calling windows syscalls from gnu assembler
  • From: shikamuk
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: question on MIPS: addiu
  • From: Harold Aptroot
• Re: question on MIPS: addiu
  • From: Keep Asking
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: Almas
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• question on MIPS: addiu
  • From: Keep Asking
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: What about SystemA() [the function for call programs] function?
  • From: rio
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Martin Str|mberg
• Mips code
  • From: shane
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Martin Str|mberg
• Re: Intel illogical syntax...
  • From: rio
• Re: announce: crudcom2 (the crude decompiler) now available, with full GPL'd source code
  • From: Willow
• Re: NASM preprocessor
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!
  • From: japheth
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Intel illogical syntax...
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: J.Dorval
• Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: Alexei fixes for NASM w/Borland TD
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• announce: crudcom2 (the crude decompiler) now available, with full GPL'd source code
  • From: Willow
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Windela
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: rio
• Re: delete "0D"
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• delete "0D"
  • From: J.Dorval
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!
  • From: japheth
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: JWasm v1.9 - now 1.91!!!
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Nathan Baker
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: a little program for format asm code
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: a little program for format asm code
  • From: rio
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: a little program for format asm code
  • From: rio
• Re: a little program for format asm code
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: rio
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Chuck Crayne
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Linux News Reader.
  • From: Betov
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Karel Lejska
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: time to leave?
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Nathan Baker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Dave -Turner
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: rio
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Nathan Baker
• Re: Linux News Reader.
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: Linux News Reader.
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Linux News Reader.
  • From: santosh
• Linux News Reader.
  • From: Betov
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Betov
• Re: time to leave?
  • From: Betov
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Karel Lejska
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: rio
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: rio
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: rio
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• add New 'macro' for stack and address?
  • From: rio
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: time to leave?
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
  • From: Willow
• Re: time to leave?
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: time to leave?
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: time to leave?
  • From: Betov
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Betov
• Re: time to leave?
  • From: santosh
• Re: time to leave?
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: OT/hypothetical: dot-matrix style ion-beam lithography
  • From: cr88192
• Re: Startup routine initialization
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Startup routine initialization
  • From: Sharwan
• Re: OT/hypothetical: dot-matrix style ion-beam lithography
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: JC
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: I pee in the open
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Is it better programming in asm using top-down or bottom-up?
  • From: rio
• Re: Vectors (cpu type idea)
  • From: NathanCBaker
• Re: Vectors (cpu type idea)
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• OT/hypothetical: dot-matrix style ion-beam lithography
  • From: cr88192

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(12)