Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
- From: Frank Kotler <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 12:27:11 -0400
Rod Pemberton wrote:
....
I also noticed that 'lfs' and 'lgs' disassembled correctly, but
not 'lds' and 'les'...(?)
This is one that's been discovered and fixed. Get the very latest, hot off the presses, version here:
ftp://ftp.zytor.com/pub/nasm/snapshots/
Or watch it as it happens:
http://repo.or.cz/w/nasm.git
Sorry 'bout the "instability"... They complained when it was "dead", too... :)
Best,
Frank
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
- From: Rod Pemberton
- Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
- From: NathanCBaker
- Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
- References:
- NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
- From: Rod Pemberton
- NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
- Prev by Date: Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
- Next by Date: Re: a little program for format asm code
- Previous by thread: Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
- Next by thread: Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
- Index(es):