Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly

From: "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:50:07 -0400

"Frank Kotler" <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g84aq7$vr3$1@xxxxxxxxxxx

Rod Pemberton wrote:
...

I also noticed that 'lfs' and 'lgs' disassembled correctly, but
not 'lds' and 'les'...(?)

This is one that's been discovered and fixed.

Ndisasm 0.98.39
00000481 660F02C3 lar eax,ebx
000004F1 660F03C3 lsl eax,ebx

Ndisasm 2.03.01
00000481 660F02C3 lar eax,bx
000004F1 660F03C3 lsl eax,bx

Rod Pemberton

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  - From: Frank Kotler

References:
- NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  - From: Rod Pemberton
- Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
  - From: Frank Kotler

Prev by Date: Re: announce: my very first disassembler now available (GPL)
Next by Date: Re: a little program for format asm code
Previous by thread: Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
Next by thread: Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread