Re: NASM 0.98.39 vs. NASM 2.03.01 disassembly

"Frank Kotler" <fbkotler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g8epv7$82s$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
I think we're miscommunicating here, Rod. I know you know your ***, but
I'm quite certain Ndisasm is "fixed" not "broken" between 0.98.39 and
2.03.01...

I'm still not sure what the justification for that tenacious belief is...

That is what Ndisasm is doing to lsl, and lar
decodes... It's emitting a 16-bit register for a 32-bit one,
erroneously.

Well, file a bug report:

Four guys who develop NASM reading a.l.a. and I have to file a bug report?
....

<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=106208&group_id=6208&func=browse>


From the length of that list it seems they aren't being resolved, but OK
I'll file one.

This is it: ID 2063064.

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&atid=106208&aid=2063064&group_id=6208


Rod Pemberton

.

Quantcast