Re: delete "0D"
- From: "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 02:33:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 23, 12:54 am, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Am Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:15:33 -0400 schrieb Frank Kotler:
J.Dorval wrote:
"Dirk Wolfgang Glomp" <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de
news: 1j16eimzxzhq$.11tsnlqksomiu$.__BEGIN_MASK_n#9g02mG7!__...__END_MASK_i?a63jfAD$z__@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
DATEN SEGMENT use32 'DATA'
Did you intend for this to be "use32", Dirk???
I think this results a data segment with a dword alignment.
That's possible, but I wouldn't rely on it. Use16/32 is primarily to
tell the assembler the addressing mode for which the code should be
generated (affects: 66 & 67 prefix generation and default operand and
address size and sometimes the immediate operand size, ModR/M+SIB
generation). For segment alignment there's ALIGN=.
Alex
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: delete "0D"
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: delete "0D"
- References:
- delete "0D"
- From: J.Dorval
- Re: delete "0D"
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: delete "0D"
- From: J.Dorval
- Re: delete "0D"
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- delete "0D"
- Prev by Date: Re: delete "0D"
- Next by Date: Re: delete "0D"
- Previous by thread: Re: delete "0D"
- Next by thread: Re: delete "0D"
- Index(es):