Re: CPU Stress
From: Cedric Lauradoux (lauradou_at_pazuzu.inria.fr)
Date: 04/09/04
- Next message: ziliath: "stack pointer part 2"
- Previous message: arjan de lumens: "Re: CPU Stress"
- In reply to: Scott Moore: "Re: CPU Stress"
- Next in thread: Matt Taylor: "Re: CPU Stress"
- Reply: Matt Taylor: "Re: CPU Stress"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 18:20:19 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Scott Moore wrote:
> "Dada" <tictbh@india.com> wrote in message news:d3dd5d76.0404062119.76099fe3@posting.google.com...
> > Hello All,
> > I want to write a small program , which will put a maximum stress on
> > CPU.
> > Which instructions should I prefer for this , I mean Floating Point
> > Operations(fmul, fadd) or Arithmetic Operations ( INC , DEC).
> > Are there any particular instructions which guarantees to put maximum
> > stress on CPU.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dada
> >
> >
>
> Turn caching off and access $00000000 and $ffffffff in rapid sucession,
> with data values of $00000000 and $ffffffff.
Okay how are caching off on an X86 processor ?? If you know how to
disable or turn off some other stuff of a processor I would be please
to know that ...
> This causes the path to memory to stay in toggling state. Otherwise,
> it would simply be cached and the memory interface would go to sleep.
> The alternating all 0's and all 1's patterns cause all the address
> and data drivers to flip on and off at once.
>
>
>
- Next message: ziliath: "stack pointer part 2"
- Previous message: arjan de lumens: "Re: CPU Stress"
- In reply to: Scott Moore: "Re: CPU Stress"
- Next in thread: Matt Taylor: "Re: CPU Stress"
- Reply: Matt Taylor: "Re: CPU Stress"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|