Re: x86 architecture questions
From: Grumble (invalid_at_kma.eu.org)
Date: 04/25/04
- Next message: Eric: "Re: how is range on hard disk???"
- Previous message: lallous: "Re: Software Protection and Anti Crack code"
- Next in thread: Matt Taylor: "Re: x86 architecture questions"
- Reply: Matt Taylor: "Re: x86 architecture questions"
- Reply: Ivan Korotkov: "Re: x86 architecture questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 20:10:02 +0000 (UTC)
Matt Taylor wrote:
> It is worth pointing out that this is why the privilege levels are
> so useless. A tiered protection scheme would be very helpful for
> protecting OS structures from drivers and still allowing drivers to
> do their job. Instead, rings 0, 1, and 2 are treated equally by the
> paging mechanism.
Matt,
Are you saying that privilege levels 1 and 2 on IA-32 are useless? Or
do you mean that privilege levels are useless altogether?
Is it even possible to write a POSIX-compliant OS for a CPU that does
not implement privilege levels? Where any application can execute what
we now consider privileged instructions.
- Next message: Eric: "Re: how is range on hard disk???"
- Previous message: lallous: "Re: Software Protection and Anti Crack code"
- Next in thread: Matt Taylor: "Re: x86 architecture questions"
- Reply: Matt Taylor: "Re: x86 architecture questions"
- Reply: Ivan Korotkov: "Re: x86 architecture questions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|