Re: Questions about K&R...
From: Roy Jones (mhca12_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 04/27/04
- Previous message: Cameron Gibbs: "The Linear Address Space"
- Next in thread: Frank Kotler: "Re: Questions about K&R..."
- Reply: Frank Kotler: "Re: Questions about K&R..."
- Reply: Frank Kotler: "Re: Questions about K&R..."
- Reply: Frank Kotler: "Re: Questions about K&R..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 11:10:02 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:42:34 +0000 (UTC), Scott J. McCaughrin
<sjmccaug@bluestem.prairienet.org> wrote:
> The best I have used is A86 for 16-bit assembly and D86 for 16-bit
> debugging. Both are free (check Google for "A86") but only support
> up to the '286 and '287. A full-blown A386/D386 supports the Pentium
> instruction set.
A86/D86 are not free for commercial use, they are still sold as shareware
by Eric Issacson at www.eij.com. A386 supports Pentium III and Athlon
instruction sets.
> The worst I have used is Nasm/Ndisasm, with others in between.
No argument on ndisasm, but I like how nasm works with GCC.
Roy
- Previous message: Cameron Gibbs: "The Linear Address Space"
- Next in thread: Frank Kotler: "Re: Questions about K&R..."
- Reply: Frank Kotler: "Re: Questions about K&R..."
- Reply: Frank Kotler: "Re: Questions about K&R..."
- Reply: Frank Kotler: "Re: Questions about K&R..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
