Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop?
From: Ivan Korotkov (koroNOSPAMtkov2_at_ztelDOT.ru)
Date: 05/29/04
- Previous message: rjb: "Re: TRW2000"
- In reply to: Matt Taylor: "Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop?"
- Next in thread: Matt Taylor: "Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop?"
- Reply: Matt Taylor: "Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 23:48:21 +0000 (UTC)
> Page stealing or whatever you'd like to call it is a good idea. Evicting
> files from the cache to keep more than 1 GB of ram free is utterly stupid.
> They don't even try to predict the paging demand. I turn off the swap file
> as well to avoid this undesirable behavior.
But Windows still is able to remove image pages from RAM and page-in them
again, isn't it? And furthermore, doesn't it's behaviour mainly end up with
just moving pages between stand-by and ready lists without actually
"page-inning" and "page-outting" to/from HDD?
Ivan
- Previous message: rjb: "Re: TRW2000"
- In reply to: Matt Taylor: "Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop?"
- Next in thread: Matt Taylor: "Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop?"
- Reply: Matt Taylor: "Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]