comp.lang.asm.x86
By Author

434 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

---

Starting: 05/31/04
Ending: 06/29/04

• *ProteanThread*
  • are there any chat or forum sites related to ml / asm programming ? (06/07/04)
• aaron
  • Re: OS development (06/02/04)
• Alex McDonald
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/07/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/07/04)
  • Re: In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? (06/04/04)
• aliSaghae
  • indirect Addressing Mode (06/27/04)
• Andreas Groegel
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/26/04)
• Andrew Skouloudis
  • Re: mov command does not wirte on memory !!! (06/10/04)
  • mov command does not wirte on memory !!! (06/09/04)
• André Janz
  • Re: IDA beginner (06/14/04)
• Anish
  • Re: NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! (06/23/04)
  • NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! (06/17/04)
• arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/18/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/17/04)
  • Re: Looking for AWARD Bios Source Code (06/17/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/14/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/11/04)
  • Re: Grammar for x86 assembly (06/10/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/08/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/07/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/06/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/05/04)
• arargh406NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com
  • Re: FileTimeToDosDateTime invalid parameter (06/22/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/19/04)
  • Re: Examining interrupt code (06/19/04)
• Ben Meyer
  • Re: bootloader not bootloading correctly :) (06/24/04)
  • Re: IDA beginner (06/14/04)
  • Re: Interesting article by Randall Hyde (05/31/04)
• Betov
  • Re: Visual Assembler (06/17/04)
  • Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/13/04)
  • Re: HLA compile problem (06/13/04)
  • Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/12/04)
  • Re: IDA beginner (06/12/04)
  • Re: IDA beginner (06/11/04)
• Bjarni Juliusson
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/07/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/06/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/05/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/05/04)
  • Re: OS development (06/01/04)
• Bo Persson
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/25/04)
• Bob
  • Backup for developers (06/21/04)
• Bob Masta
  • Re: Switch setting change question (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/23/04)
  • Re: data or instructions? (06/17/04)
  • Re: Visual Assembler (06/17/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/07/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/05/04)
  • Re: Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? (06/05/04)
  • Re: Need help printing the IVT, General Purpose Registers and the Flags Registers (06/04/04)
• Bob Smith
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/13/04)
• Bryan Bullard
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/18/04)
  • Re: OS development (06/04/04)
• Bryan Parkoff
  • Which Is Better To Use 8 Bits, 16 Bits, or 32 Bits? (06/14/04)
  • Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Part 2 (06/13/04)
  • Re: IDA beginner (06/11/04)
  • Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/11/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/05/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/05/04)
  • Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/04/04)
  • Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/04/04)
  • Stored Forwarding Block Problem (06/01/04)
  • Stored Forwarding Block Problem (06/01/04)
  • Re: Link Struct / Class From MASM to C/C++??? (06/01/04)
• c0d1f1ed
  • Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/10/04)
• Charles A. Crayne
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/26/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/26/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/23/04)
  • Opting out of spam trap testing (06/23/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
  • Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
  • Re: data or instructions? (06/16/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/11/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/10/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/10/04)
  • Re: opcode calculator?? (06/02/04)
• Chauncey Smith
  • Need help printing the IVT, General Purpose Registers and the Flags Registers (06/04/04)
• Chen L.
  • Is there a "soft emulator" for 386ex? (06/10/04)
• Chewy509
  • Re: Good assembler debugger (06/14/04)
• CHK
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/06/04)
  • Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated (06/06/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/04/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/04/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/04/04)
• Chris
  • HLA compile problem (06/13/04)
• Chris Giese
  • Re: access PCI memory space through BIOS int 15/87h (06/22/04)
• Christian Lande
  • Re: prefetchnta (06/28/04)
  • Re: prefetchnta (06/27/04)
  • prefetchnta (06/26/04)
  • Re: Xeon and Events (06/08/04)
  • Re: Xeon and Events (06/04/04)
• Clax86
  • Having trouble posting? (06/23/04)
  • Having trouble posting? (06/16/04)
  • Get the FAQs (06/14/04)
  • Having trouble posting? (06/09/04)
  • Get the FAQs (06/07/04)
  • Having trouble posting? (06/02/04)
• David J. Craig
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
• DJ Delorie
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
• Dr John Stockton
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/26/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/26/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/25/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
• E P Chandler
  • dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/13/04)
• eGze
  • Optimize (06/04/04)
• erbenton
  • posts just dropped (06/23/04)
• erebus2161
  • Disassemblers yield different results (06/21/04)
• Eric
  • coding far calls in protected mode (06/23/04)
  • far call in pmode (06/23/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/12/04)
• f0dder
  • Re: Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM (06/27/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/22/04)
  • Re: Visual Assembler (06/17/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/17/04)
• Felix Radensky
  • Re: GCC inline assembly question (06/27/04)
  • Re: GCC inline assembly question (06/25/04)
  • GCC inline assembly question (06/24/04)
• FiZ
  • Switch setting change question (06/27/04)
• flekso
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/26/04)
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/25/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: NewBie; book to start x86 assembly (06/02/04)
• Frank Kotler
  • Re: NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! (06/24/04)
  • Re: NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! (06/17/04)
  • Re: mov command does not wirte on memory !!! (06/09/04)
  • Re: Need help printing the IVT, General Purpose Registers and the Flags (06/04/04)
• Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
  • Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues (06/11/04)
• fys
  • x86 Assembly Language FAQ - General Part I (06/03/04)
  • x86 Assembly Language FAQ - A86 and D86 (06/03/04)
  • x86 Assembly Language FAQ - General Part III (06/03/04)
  • x86 Assembly Language FAQ - MASM (06/03/04)
  • CLAX FAQ update (06/03/04)
  • x86 Assembly Language FAQ - General Part II (06/03/04)
  • x86 Assembly Language FAQ - TASM (06/03/04)
• Gary Walker
  • Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/06/04)
• goblin
  • Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated (06/07/04)
• Grumble
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/25/04)
  • Re: Pentium 4 - Register TRANSLATED (06/24/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
  • Re: OT: NDA's and interfaces (06/22/04)
  • Re: convert inline gcc asm to Visual c++ (06/15/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Part 2 (06/14/04)
  • Re: Interesting article by Randall Hyde (06/08/04)
  • Re: Optimize (06/07/04)
  • Re: Xeon and Events (06/07/04)
  • Re: Xeon and Events (06/02/04)
• Herman Dullink
  • Re: memory copying onto video memory (06/22/04)
• hutch--
  • Re: Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM (06/27/04)
  • Re: Visual Assembler (06/17/04)
  • Re: Grammar for x86 assembly (06/11/04)
  • Re: HLA1.64/Masm32 question (06/09/04)
  • Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/07/04)
  • Re: In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? (06/04/04)
  • Re: Array initializing in MASM (06/02/04)
• IIJIMA Hiromitsu
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/29/04)
  • Re: Disassemblers yield different results (06/25/04)
  • Re: Disassemblers yield different results (06/21/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/19/04)
• iso8859-1
  • Re: HLA1.64/Masm32 question (06/09/04)
  • HLA1.64/Masm32 question (06/08/04)
• Ivan Korotkov
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/29/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/26/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/26/04)
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/26/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/23/04)
  • Re: NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! (06/23/04)
  • Re: Pentium 4 - Register TRANSLATED (06/23/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/23/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/23/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/22/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/14/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/14/04)
  • Re: Is there a "soft emulator" for 386ex? (06/11/04)
  • Re: IDA beginner (06/11/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/11/04)
  • Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/06/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/06/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/05/04)
  • Re: Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? (06/05/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/04/04)
  • Re: LDS instruction? (06/04/04)
  • Re: bit representation of assembler commands (06/04/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/04/04)
  • Re: LDS instruction? (06/04/04)
  • Re: LDS instruction? (06/04/04)
  • Re: Struct / Class Performance? (06/02/04)
  • Re: OS development (05/31/04)
  • Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop? (05/31/04)
• Jack Pappas
  • MMX Comparison Instructions (06/25/04)
• Jan Bruns
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/04/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/01/04)
• JasmineCorp
  • binary to decimal (06/10/04)
• Jim
  • Re: IDA beginner (06/11/04)
  • Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/11/04)
• Jim Carlock
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/23/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/22/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/22/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/22/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/18/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/17/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/14/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/14/04)
  • Re: Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? (06/05/04)
  • Re: Link Struct / Class From MASM to C/C++??? (06/04/04)
• Jim Higgins
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/23/04)
• Joe Cosby
  • IDA beginner (06/11/04)
• John H. Lindsay
  • Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated (06/06/04)
• John Miller
  • Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/13/04)
  • Re: Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? (06/05/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/05/04)
• jon bird
  • access PCI memory space through BIOS int 15/87h (06/14/04)
• Jonathan Bartlett
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/25/04)
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/25/04)
  • Re: [gas][newbie]call printf with a float (06/17/04)
• Julian Brown
  • Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/06/04)
• Juzio1313
  • Re: Is there a "soft emulator" for 386ex? (06/12/04)
• Kevin G. Rhoads
  • Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows (06/07/04)
• Krazi
  • Bug hides under Olly debug! (06/24/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/22/04)
  • FileTimeToDosDateTime invalid parameter (06/22/04)
  • Win32 software interrupts? (06/19/04)
  • Examining interrupt code (06/19/04)
• Kyle Root
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/14/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/11/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/10/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/10/04)
  • A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/10/04)
• Manfred Hauser
  • Sorry, wrong group (06/23/04)
  • Pentium 4 - Register (06/23/04)
• Markus Humm
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/17/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/17/04)
  • Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows (06/08/04)
• Matt
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/12/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/11/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/09/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/09/04)
  • EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/07/04)
• Matt Taylor
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/29/04)
  • Re: GCC inline assembly question (06/28/04)
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/27/04)
  • Re: MMX Comparison Instructions (06/26/04)
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/26/04)
  • Re: GCC inline assembly question (06/26/04)
  • Re: GCC inline assembly question (06/25/04)
  • Re: Returning dword as a result from a function (06/25/04)
  • Re: MMX Comparison Instructions (06/25/04)
  • Re: FileTimeToDosDateTime invalid parameter (06/22/04)
  • Re: data or instructions? (06/17/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Part 2 (06/15/04)
  • Re: Which Is Better To Use 8 Bits, 16 Bits, or 32 Bits? (06/15/04)
  • Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/07/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/07/04)
  • Re: are there any chat or forum sites related to ml / asm programming ? (06/07/04)
  • Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/06/04)
  • Re: In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? (06/06/04)
  • Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit (06/05/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/04/04)
  • Re: LEA instruction (06/02/04)
  • Re: Struct / Class Performance? (06/02/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/01/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/01/04)
• Michael Brown
  • OT: NDA's and interfaces (06/20/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/06/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/05/04)
  • Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon (06/01/04)
• Mudd
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/28/04)
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/28/04)
  • Re: Determining the Windows version (06/28/04)
  • Determining the Windows version (06/26/04)
• Nils O. Selċsdal
  • Re: Newbie: easiest assembler program (06/28/04)
• Nudge
  • Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues (06/10/04)
  • Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues (06/09/04)
• Olivier Ravard
  • gas + gcc (06/11/04)
• patrick_at_klos.com
  • Re: indirect Addressing Mode (06/28/04)
  • Re: Returning dword as a result from a function (06/25/04)
• pH
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/25/04)
  • Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows (06/08/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/08/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/07/04)
• Phil Carmody
  • Re: C -> assembler small function Help Me :) (06/21/04)
  • Re: Backup for developers (06/21/04)
  • Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/07/04)
  • Re: Stored Forwarding Block Problem (06/03/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (06/01/04)
• Prabhu
  • Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows (06/08/04)
  • Porting a DOS app to Windows (06/07/04)
  • Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? (06/04/04)
• Ramkumar Chinchani
  • data or instructions? (06/16/04)
  • Grammar for x86 assembly (06/10/04)
• Randall Hyde
  • HLA v1.66 is now available (06/19/04)
  • Re: Visual Assembler (06/17/04)
  • Re: HLA compile problem (06/15/04)
  • Re: HLA compile problem (06/13/04)
  • Re: binary to decimal (06/11/04)
  • Re: Grammar for x86 assembly (06/11/04)
  • Re: Interesting article by Randall Hyde (06/08/04)
  • Re: HLA1.64/Masm32 question (06/08/04)
  • Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated (06/07/04)
  • Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated (06/06/04)
  • HLA v1.65 is up on Webster (06/06/04)
  • Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated (06/05/04)
• Reni
  • Was: Newbie: Improvements in processors NOW: Thank You! (06/29/04)
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/26/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/25/04)
  • Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/25/04)
• René
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
• rjb
  • Re: opcode calculator?? (06/02/04)
• Robert Redelmeier
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/25/04)
  • Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors (06/25/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/25/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/23/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
  • Re: memory copying onto video memory (06/21/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/17/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/16/04)
• Robert Wessel
  • Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/13/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/13/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/12/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/11/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/11/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/10/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/10/04)
  • Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows (06/08/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/08/04)
  • Re: LDS instruction? (06/03/04)
  • Re: LDS instruction? (06/03/04)
• Roman Ziak
  • Re: Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM (06/27/04)
• rossbullock_at_sbcglobal.net
  • Re: Looking for AWARD Bios Source Code (06/29/04)
• Salman Khilji
  • convert inline gcc asm to Visual c++ (06/13/04)
• Scott Moore
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/19/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/18/04)
  • Re: In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? (06/17/04)
  • Re: OS development (06/02/04)
• Scott Simontis
  • Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM (06/27/04)
• SenderX
  • Re: gas + gcc (06/12/04)
• Shiva
  • Virtual memory (06/18/04)
  • Re: Good assembler debugger (06/14/04)
  • Good assembler debugger (06/14/04)
• Siberian Husky
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/27/04)
  • Re: MMX Comparison Instructions (06/27/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/26/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/26/04)
  • Re: MMX Comparison Instructions (06/25/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/25/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/25/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
  • Re: memory copying onto video memory (06/23/04)
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/23/04)
• Socket
  • Re: Disassemblers yield different results (06/25/04)
  • Re: Disassemblers yield different results (06/24/04)
• Sovereign Sockpuppet)
  • Visual Assembler (06/16/04)
• spam_at_merlyn.demon.co.uk
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/22/04)
• Spike
  • In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? (06/03/04)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: prefetchnta (06/27/04)
  • Re: prefetchnta (06/27/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: memory copying onto video memory (06/21/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/21/04)
  • Re: Win32 software interrupts? (06/19/04)
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/18/04)
  • Re: Which Is Better To Use 8 Bits, 16 Bits, or 32 Bits? (06/14/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Part 2 (06/14/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/13/04)
  • Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows (06/08/04)
  • Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows (06/08/04)
• Steve
  • Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/07/04)
• Stonelock
  • bootloader not bootloading correctly :) (06/22/04)
• T.M. Sommers
  • Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures (06/24/04)
  • Re: [gas][newbie]call printf with a float (06/17/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/11/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/10/04)
  • Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues (06/09/04)
• Thomas Glanzmann
  • Looking for AWARD Bios Source Code (06/16/04)
• Tim Roberts
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/16/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/14/04)
  • Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/14/04)
  • Re: Grammar for x86 assembly (06/12/04)
  • Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? (06/12/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/12/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/12/04)
  • Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables (06/10/04)
  • Re: Stored Forwarding Block Problem (06/05/04)
  • Re: Stored Forwarding Block Problem (06/03/04)
  • Re: LDS instruction? (06/03/04)
  • Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore (06/01/04)
• TS
  • Re: Virtual memory (06/18/04)
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/16/04)
• tweak
  • Re: C -> assembler small function Help Me :) (06/21/04)
• Viji Sandy
  • Returning dword as a result from a function (06/25/04)
• Vinnie
  • Re: opcode calculator?? (06/02/04)
  • Re: opcode calculator?? (06/02/04)
• Vortex
  • Re: Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM (06/27/04)
• Warwick Barnes
  • Re: opcode calculator?? (06/02/04)
• whisper
  • Re: memory copying onto video memory (06/22/04)
  • Re: memory copying onto video memory (06/22/04)
  • memory copying onto video memory (06/21/04)
• wolfgang kern
  • Re: OT: NDA's and interfaces (06/23/04)
  • Re: Which Is Better To Use 8 Bits, 16 Bits, or 32 Bits? (06/14/04)
  • Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. (06/14/04)
  • Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues (06/09/04)
  • Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set (06/07/04)
  • Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery (06/05/04)
• Yves Kuhry
  • Re: [gas][newbie]call printf with a float (06/20/04)
  • [gas][newbie]call printf with a float (06/16/04)
• Zdenek Sojka
  • Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP (06/17/04)
  • PIC and IR when masked manually or masked (06/16/04)
  • Re: binary to decimal (06/11/04)
  • Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues (06/09/04)
  • Re: Emulating FPU (06/03/04)
  • Re: bit representation of assembler commands (06/03/04)
  • Re: LDS instruction? (06/03/04)

Last message date: 06/29/04
Archived on: 06/30/04 CEST

---

434 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ]

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Assembler  > comp.lang.asm.x86  > 2004-06