comp.lang.asm.x86
By Date
434 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Starting: 05/31/04
Ending: 06/29/04
- Was: Newbie: Improvements in processors NOW: Thank You! Reni (06/29/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version Matt Taylor (06/29/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version IIJIMA Hiromitsu (06/29/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version Ivan Korotkov (06/29/04)
- Re: Looking for AWARD Bios Source Code rossbullock_at_sbcglobal.net (06/29/04)
- Re: indirect Addressing Mode patrick_at_klos.com (06/28/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version Mudd (06/28/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version Mudd (06/28/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version Mudd (06/28/04)
- Re: Newbie: easiest assembler program Nils O. Selċsdal (06/28/04)
- Re: GCC inline assembly question Matt Taylor (06/28/04)
- Re: prefetchnta Christian Lande (06/28/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/27/04)
- Re: prefetchnta Stephen Sprunk (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures David J. Craig (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Ivan Korotkov (06/27/04)
- Re: prefetchnta Christian Lande (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Dr John Stockton (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Dr John Stockton (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/27/04)
- Re: Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM f0dder (06/27/04)
- Re: Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM Vortex (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/27/04)
- Re: GCC inline assembly question Felix Radensky (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Robert Redelmeier (06/27/04)
- Re: Switch setting change question Bob Masta (06/27/04)
- Re: prefetchnta Stephen Sprunk (06/27/04)
- Switch setting change question FiZ (06/27/04)
- indirect Addressing Mode aliSaghae (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/27/04)
- Re: MMX Comparison Instructions Siberian Husky (06/27/04)
- Re: Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM hutch-- (06/27/04)
- Re: Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM Roman Ziak (06/27/04)
- Looking for MS-Link to use with Art of Assembly Language and NASM Scott Simontis (06/27/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors Matt Taylor (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/27/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Dr John Stockton (06/27/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors Ivan Korotkov (06/27/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors Reni (06/26/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version flekso (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Dr John Stockton (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Ivan Korotkov (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Ivan Korotkov (06/26/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version Ivan Korotkov (06/26/04)
- Re: Determining the Windows version Andreas Groegel (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/26/04)
- prefetchnta Christian Lande (06/26/04)
- Determining the Windows version Mudd (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/26/04)
- Re: MMX Comparison Instructions Matt Taylor (06/26/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors Matt Taylor (06/26/04)
- Re: GCC inline assembly question Matt Taylor (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Dr John Stockton (06/26/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures pH (06/25/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Robert Redelmeier (06/25/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Jonathan Bartlett (06/25/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors Jonathan Bartlett (06/25/04)
- Re: Returning dword as a result from a function patrick_at_klos.com (06/25/04)
- Re: MMX Comparison Instructions Siberian Husky (06/25/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors flekso (06/25/04)
- Re: Disassemblers yield different results Socket (06/25/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/25/04)
- Re: GCC inline assembly question Felix Radensky (06/25/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors Bo Persson (06/25/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors Grumble (06/25/04)
- Re: Newbie: Improvements in processors Robert Redelmeier (06/25/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Reni (06/25/04)
- Newbie: Improvements in processors Reni (06/25/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/25/04)
- Re: GCC inline assembly question Matt Taylor (06/25/04)
- Re: Returning dword as a result from a function Matt Taylor (06/25/04)
- Re: MMX Comparison Instructions Matt Taylor (06/25/04)
- Re: Disassemblers yield different results IIJIMA Hiromitsu (06/25/04)
- MMX Comparison Instructions Jack Pappas (06/25/04)
- Returning dword as a result from a function Viji Sandy (06/25/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Robert Redelmeier (06/25/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Dr John Stockton (06/25/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Dr John Stockton (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/24/04)
- GCC inline assembly question Felix Radensky (06/24/04)
- Re: Pentium 4 - Register TRANSLATED Grumble (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures René (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures T.M. Sommers (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/24/04)
- Re: bootloader not bootloading correctly :) Ben Meyer (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/24/04)
- Bug hides under Olly debug! Krazi (06/24/04)
- Re: NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! Frank Kotler (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Dr John Stockton (06/24/04)
- Re: Disassemblers yield different results Socket (06/24/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Ivan Korotkov (06/23/04)
- Re: NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! Ivan Korotkov (06/23/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Jim Higgins (06/23/04)
- coding far calls in protected mode Eric (06/23/04)
- posts just dropped erbenton (06/23/04)
- far call in pmode Eric (06/23/04)
- Re: memory copying onto video memory Siberian Husky (06/23/04)
- Sorry, wrong group Manfred Hauser (06/23/04)
- Re: Pentium 4 - Register TRANSLATED Ivan Korotkov (06/23/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Robert Redelmeier (06/23/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Bob Masta (06/23/04)
- Having trouble posting? Clax86 (06/23/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Siberian Husky (06/23/04)
- Re: NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! Anish (06/23/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/23/04)
- Opting out of spam trap testing Charles A. Crayne (06/23/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Jim Carlock (06/23/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Ivan Korotkov (06/23/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Ivan Korotkov (06/23/04)
- Pentium 4 - Register Manfred Hauser (06/23/04)
- Re: OT: NDA's and interfaces wolfgang kern (06/23/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Robert Redelmeier (06/22/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Jim Carlock (06/22/04)
- Re: Virtual memory f0dder (06/22/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures spam_at_merlyn.demon.co.uk (06/22/04)
- Re: FileTimeToDosDateTime invalid parameter arargh406NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/22/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/22/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/22/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Stephen Sprunk (06/22/04)
- Re: memory copying onto video memory whisper (06/22/04)
- Re: Virtual memory flekso (06/22/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Jim Carlock (06/22/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Stephen Sprunk (06/22/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Grumble (06/22/04)
- Re: Virtual memory f0dder (06/22/04)
- Re: OT: NDA's and interfaces Grumble (06/22/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Ivan Korotkov (06/22/04)
- Re: FileTimeToDosDateTime invalid parameter Matt Taylor (06/22/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures DJ Delorie (06/22/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Robert Redelmeier (06/22/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Krazi (06/22/04)
- FileTimeToDosDateTime invalid parameter Krazi (06/22/04)
- Re: memory copying onto video memory Herman Dullink (06/22/04)
- bootloader not bootloading correctly :) Stonelock (06/22/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Scott Moore (06/22/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/22/04)
- Re: Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Robert Redelmeier (06/22/04)
- Clax86 and the New SPAM prevention measures Charles A. Crayne (06/22/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Jim Carlock (06/22/04)
- Re: Virtual memory f0dder (06/22/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP f0dder (06/22/04)
- Re: memory copying onto video memory whisper (06/22/04)
- Re: access PCI memory space through BIOS int 15/87h Chris Giese (06/22/04)
- Re: memory copying onto video memory Stephen Sprunk (06/21/04)
- Re: memory copying onto video memory Robert Redelmeier (06/21/04)
- memory copying onto video memory whisper (06/21/04)
- Re: Disassemblers yield different results IIJIMA Hiromitsu (06/21/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Stephen Sprunk (06/21/04)
- Re: C -> assembler small function Help Me :) Phil Carmody (06/21/04)
- Re: Backup for developers Phil Carmody (06/21/04)
- Disassemblers yield different results erebus2161 (06/21/04)
- Re: C -> assembler small function Help Me :) tweak (06/21/04)
- Backup for developers Bob (06/21/04)
- OT: NDA's and interfaces Michael Brown (06/20/04)
- Re: [gas][newbie]call printf with a float Yves Kuhry (06/20/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Scott Moore (06/19/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? IIJIMA Hiromitsu (06/19/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? arargh406NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/19/04)
- Re: Win32 software interrupts? Stephen Sprunk (06/19/04)
- Win32 software interrupts? Krazi (06/19/04)
- Re: Examining interrupt code arargh406NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/19/04)
- HLA v1.66 is now available Randall Hyde (06/19/04)
- Examining interrupt code Krazi (06/19/04)
- Re: Virtual memory TS (06/18/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Stephen Sprunk (06/18/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Bryan Bullard (06/18/04)
- Re: Virtual memory Scott Moore (06/18/04)
- Virtual memory Shiva (06/18/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/18/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Jim Carlock (06/18/04)
- Re: [gas][newbie]call printf with a float Jonathan Bartlett (06/17/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Markus Humm (06/17/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Markus Humm (06/17/04)
- Re: Visual Assembler Betov (06/17/04)
- Re: Visual Assembler f0dder (06/17/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP f0dder (06/17/04)
- Re: In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? Scott Moore (06/17/04)
- Re: Visual Assembler hutch-- (06/17/04)
- Re: data or instructions? Bob Masta (06/17/04)
- Re: Visual Assembler Bob Masta (06/17/04)
- Re: NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! Frank Kotler (06/17/04)
- NDISASM : Disassembly shows different instructions!! Anish (06/17/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/17/04)
- Re: Visual Assembler Randall Hyde (06/17/04)
- Re: [gas][newbie]call printf with a float T.M. Sommers (06/17/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Jim Carlock (06/17/04)
- Re: Looking for AWARD Bios Source Code arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/17/04)
- Re: data or instructions? Matt Taylor (06/17/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Zdenek Sojka (06/17/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Robert Redelmeier (06/17/04)
- PIC and IR when masked manually or masked Zdenek Sojka (06/16/04)
- Looking for AWARD Bios Source Code Thomas Glanzmann (06/16/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP TS (06/16/04)
- Re: data or instructions? Charles A. Crayne (06/16/04)
- data or instructions? Ramkumar Chinchani (06/16/04)
- [gas][newbie]call printf with a float Yves Kuhry (06/16/04)
- Visual Assembler Sovereign Sockpuppet) (06/16/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Robert Redelmeier (06/16/04)
- Having trouble posting? Clax86 (06/16/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Tim Roberts (06/16/04)
- Re: convert inline gcc asm to Visual c++ Grumble (06/15/04)
- Re: HLA compile problem Randall Hyde (06/15/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Part 2 Matt Taylor (06/15/04)
- Re: Which Is Better To Use 8 Bits, 16 Bits, or 32 Bits? Matt Taylor (06/15/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Jim Carlock (06/14/04)
- Re: Which Is Better To Use 8 Bits, 16 Bits, or 32 Bits? wolfgang kern (06/14/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. wolfgang kern (06/14/04)
- Re: Good assembler debugger Shiva (06/14/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Part 2 Grumble (06/14/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Ivan Korotkov (06/14/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Ivan Korotkov (06/14/04)
- Re: IDA beginner André Janz (06/14/04)
- Re: Which Is Better To Use 8 Bits, 16 Bits, or 32 Bits? Stephen Sprunk (06/14/04)
- Get the FAQs Clax86 (06/14/04)
- Which Is Better To Use 8 Bits, 16 Bits, or 32 Bits? Bryan Parkoff (06/14/04)
- Re: IDA beginner Ben Meyer (06/14/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Jim Carlock (06/14/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Tim Roberts (06/14/04)
- Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? Tim Roberts (06/14/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Part 2 Stephen Sprunk (06/14/04)
- Re: Good assembler debugger Chewy509 (06/14/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/14/04)
- Good assembler debugger Shiva (06/14/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Kyle Root (06/14/04)
- access PCI memory space through BIOS int 15/87h jon bird (06/14/04)
- Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? Betov (06/13/04)
- Re: HLA compile problem Betov (06/13/04)
- Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Part 2 Bryan Parkoff (06/13/04)
- Re: dos functions behave differently under windows XP Stephen Sprunk (06/13/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Bob Smith (06/13/04)
- convert inline gcc asm to Visual c++ Salman Khilji (06/13/04)
- dos functions behave differently under windows XP E P Chandler (06/13/04)
- Re: HLA compile problem Randall Hyde (06/13/04)
- Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? Robert Wessel (06/13/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Robert Wessel (06/13/04)
- HLA compile problem Chris (06/13/04)
- Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? John Miller (06/13/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Eric (06/12/04)
- Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? Betov (06/12/04)
- Re: IDA beginner Betov (06/12/04)
- Re: Grammar for x86 assembly Tim Roberts (06/12/04)
- Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? Tim Roberts (06/12/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Tim Roberts (06/12/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Tim Roberts (06/12/04)
- Re: Is there a "soft emulator" for 386ex? Juzio1313 (06/12/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Robert Wessel (06/12/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Matt (06/12/04)
- Re: gas + gcc SenderX (06/12/04)
- Re: IDA beginner Bryan Parkoff (06/11/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Robert Wessel (06/11/04)
- Re: IDA beginner Betov (06/11/04)
- Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues Frode Vatvedt Fjeld (06/11/04)
- gas + gcc Olivier Ravard (06/11/04)
- Re: Is there a "soft emulator" for 386ex? Ivan Korotkov (06/11/04)
- Re: IDA beginner Ivan Korotkov (06/11/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Ivan Korotkov (06/11/04)
- Re: Grammar for x86 assembly hutch-- (06/11/04)
- Re: IDA beginner Jim (06/11/04)
- Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? Jim (06/11/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. T.M. Sommers (06/11/04)
- Re: binary to decimal Randall Hyde (06/11/04)
- Re: Grammar for x86 assembly Randall Hyde (06/11/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Matt (06/11/04)
- Re: Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? Bryan Parkoff (06/11/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Kyle Root (06/11/04)
- IDA beginner Joe Cosby (06/11/04)
- Re: binary to decimal Zdenek Sojka (06/11/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/11/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Robert Wessel (06/11/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Charles A. Crayne (06/11/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Kyle Root (06/10/04)
- Re: Grammar for x86 assembly arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/10/04)
- Why is Intel VTune so shamefully expensive? c0d1f1ed (06/10/04)
- Grammar for x86 assembly Ramkumar Chinchani (06/10/04)
- Is there a "soft emulator" for 386ex? Chen L. (06/10/04)
- binary to decimal JasmineCorp (06/10/04)
- Re: mov command does not wirte on memory !!! Andrew Skouloudis (06/10/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Robert Wessel (06/10/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Robert Wessel (06/10/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Tim Roberts (06/10/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Charles A. Crayne (06/10/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Kyle Root (06/10/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. T.M. Sommers (06/10/04)
- Re: A question regarding segments and addressing. Charles A. Crayne (06/10/04)
- A question regarding segments and addressing. Kyle Root (06/10/04)
- Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues Nudge (06/10/04)
- Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues wolfgang kern (06/09/04)
- Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues Zdenek Sojka (06/09/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Matt (06/09/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Matt (06/09/04)
- Re: HLA1.64/Masm32 question iso8859-1 (06/09/04)
- Having trouble posting? Clax86 (06/09/04)
- Re: HLA1.64/Masm32 question hutch-- (06/09/04)
- Re: mov command does not wirte on memory !!! Frank Kotler (06/09/04)
- Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues Nudge (06/09/04)
- mov command does not wirte on memory !!! Andrew Skouloudis (06/09/04)
- Re: Tool to convert EFLAGS Hex to flagvalues T.M. Sommers (06/09/04)
- Re: Interesting article by Randall Hyde Randall Hyde (06/08/04)
- Re: Interesting article by Randall Hyde Grumble (06/08/04)
- Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows Robert Wessel (06/08/04)
- Re: HLA1.64/Masm32 question Randall Hyde (06/08/04)
- Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows Stephen Sprunk (06/08/04)
- Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows pH (06/08/04)
- HLA1.64/Masm32 question iso8859-1 (06/08/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery pH (06/08/04)
- Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows Prabhu (06/08/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Robert Wessel (06/08/04)
- Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows Stephen Sprunk (06/08/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/08/04)
- Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows Markus Humm (06/08/04)
- Re: Xeon and Events Christian Lande (06/08/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Alex McDonald (06/07/04)
- Re: EXE Header File Relocation Tables Alex McDonald (06/07/04)
- Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set Matt Taylor (06/07/04)
- Re: Porting a DOS app to Windows Kevin G. Rhoads (06/07/04)
- Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set Steve (06/07/04)
- EXE Header File Relocation Tables Matt (06/07/04)
- Re: Optimize Grumble (06/07/04)
- Re: Xeon and Events Grumble (06/07/04)
- Porting a DOS app to Windows Prabhu (06/07/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit Matt Taylor (06/07/04)
- Re: are there any chat or forum sites related to ml / asm programming ? Matt Taylor (06/07/04)
- Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set Phil Carmody (06/07/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Bob Masta (06/07/04)
- Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set wolfgang kern (06/07/04)
- Get the FAQs Clax86 (06/07/04)
- Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated Randall Hyde (06/07/04)
- are there any chat or forum sites related to ml / asm programming ? *ProteanThread* (06/07/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery pH (06/07/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit Bjarni Juliusson (06/07/04)
- Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set hutch-- (06/07/04)
- Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated goblin (06/07/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/07/04)
- Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set Ivan Korotkov (06/06/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Michael Brown (06/06/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit Bjarni Juliusson (06/06/04)
- Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set Matt Taylor (06/06/04)
- Re: Compiling to the Intel instruction set Julian Brown (06/06/04)
- Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated Randall Hyde (06/06/04)
- Re: In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? Matt Taylor (06/06/04)
- Compiling to the Intel instruction set Gary Walker (06/06/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon CHK (06/06/04)
- Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated CHK (06/06/04)
- HLA v1.65 is up on Webster Randall Hyde (06/06/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/06/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit Ivan Korotkov (06/06/04)
- Re: Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated John H. Lindsay (06/06/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit Matt Taylor (06/05/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery wolfgang kern (06/05/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit Bjarni Juliusson (06/05/04)
- Re: Stored Forwarding Block Problem Tim Roberts (06/05/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit arargh405NOSPAM_at_NOW.AT.arargh.com (06/05/04)
- Assembler Developer's Kit (HLA v2.0) Updated Randall Hyde (06/05/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Bryan Parkoff (06/05/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Bob Masta (06/05/04)
- Re: Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? Bob Masta (06/05/04)
- Re: Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit Bjarni Juliusson (06/05/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Michael Brown (06/05/04)
- Re: Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? Jim Carlock (06/05/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Bryan Parkoff (06/05/04)
- Re: Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? John Miller (06/05/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Ivan Korotkov (06/05/04)
- Re: Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? Ivan Korotkov (06/05/04)
- Re: Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery John Miller (06/05/04)
- Re: Xeon and Events Christian Lande (06/04/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Ivan Korotkov (06/04/04)
- Optimize eGze (06/04/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon CHK (06/04/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Jan Bruns (06/04/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon CHK (06/04/04)
- Re: OS development Bryan Bullard (06/04/04)
- Windows XP:Direct access to its registers thru assembly code?? Prabhu (06/04/04)
- Re: LDS instruction? Ivan Korotkov (06/04/04)
- Re: bit representation of assembler commands Ivan Korotkov (06/04/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Ivan Korotkov (06/04/04)
- Re: LDS instruction? Ivan Korotkov (06/04/04)
- Re: LDS instruction? Ivan Korotkov (06/04/04)
- Prefix 0x0F is used in 16 Bit Bryan Parkoff (06/04/04)
- Re: Need help printing the IVT, General Purpose Registers and the Flags Registers Bob Masta (06/04/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Matt Taylor (06/04/04)
- Re: Need help printing the IVT, General Purpose Registers and the Flags Frank Kotler (06/04/04)
- Re: In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? hutch-- (06/04/04)
- Partial Register Occurs After JMP -- Mystery Bryan Parkoff (06/04/04)
- Need help printing the IVT, General Purpose Registers and the Flags Registers Chauncey Smith (06/04/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon CHK (06/04/04)
- Re: Link Struct / Class From MASM to C/C++??? Jim Carlock (06/04/04)
- Re: In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? Alex McDonald (06/04/04)
- In 5,10 or 15 years will IA-32 asm be obsolete??? Spike (06/03/04)
- Re: Stored Forwarding Block Problem Phil Carmody (06/03/04)
- Re: LDS instruction? Robert Wessel (06/03/04)
- Re: LDS instruction? Robert Wessel (06/03/04)
- Re: Stored Forwarding Block Problem Tim Roberts (06/03/04)
- Re: LDS instruction? Tim Roberts (06/03/04)
- Re: Emulating FPU Zdenek Sojka (06/03/04)
- Re: bit representation of assembler commands Zdenek Sojka (06/03/04)
- Re: LDS instruction? Zdenek Sojka (06/03/04)
- x86 Assembly Language FAQ - A86 and D86 fys (06/03/04)
- x86 Assembly Language FAQ - General Part I fys (06/03/04)
- x86 Assembly Language FAQ - General Part III fys (06/03/04)
- x86 Assembly Language FAQ - MASM fys (06/03/04)
- CLAX FAQ update fys (06/03/04)
- x86 Assembly Language FAQ - General Part II fys (06/03/04)
- x86 Assembly Language FAQ - TASM fys (06/03/04)
- Re: opcode calculator?? rjb (06/02/04)
- Re: OS development Scott Moore (06/02/04)
- Re: NewBie; book to start x86 assembly flekso (06/02/04)
- Re: Xeon and Events Grumble (06/02/04)
- Re: OS development aaron (06/02/04)
- Re: Struct / Class Performance? Ivan Korotkov (06/02/04)
- Re: Array initializing in MASM hutch-- (06/02/04)
- Having trouble posting? Clax86 (06/02/04)
- Re: LEA instruction Matt Taylor (06/02/04)
- Re: Struct / Class Performance? Matt Taylor (06/02/04)
- Re: opcode calculator?? Charles A. Crayne (06/02/04)
- Re: opcode calculator?? Vinnie (06/02/04)
- Re: opcode calculator?? Vinnie (06/02/04)
- Re: opcode calculator?? Warwick Barnes (06/02/04)
- Stored Forwarding Block Problem Bryan Parkoff (06/01/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Michael Brown (06/01/04)
- Stored Forwarding Block Problem Bryan Parkoff (06/01/04)
- Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore Phil Carmody (06/01/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Matt Taylor (06/01/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Matt Taylor (06/01/04)
- Re: OS development Bjarni Juliusson (06/01/04)
- Re: Link Struct / Class From MASM to C/C++??? Bryan Parkoff (06/01/04)
- Re: No need to optimize in assembly anymore Tim Roberts (06/01/04)
- Re: MOVNTQ on Athlon Jan Bruns (06/01/04)
- Re: Performance benefits of rep/loop? Ivan Korotkov (05/31/04)
- Re: OS development Ivan Korotkov (05/31/04)
- Re: Interesting article by Randall Hyde Ben Meyer (05/31/04)
Last message date: 06/29/04
Archived on: 06/30/04 CEST
434 messages sorted by: [ author ] [ thread ] [ subject ]
Loading