comp.lang.asm.x86
- clock cycles for a power function,
Aurélien
- Re: clock cycles for a power function, Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: clock cycles for a power function, Robert Redelmeier
- FINIT/FFREE no effect,
Thomas Pototschnig
- Re: FINIT/FFREE no effect, Thomas Pototschnig
- Entire GUI operating system in ASM?,
Doug
- Re: [Clax86list] Entire GUI operating system in ASM?, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?,
Patrick Klos
- Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?, spamtrap
- Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?, Matt
- Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?,
wolfgang kern
- Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?, spamtrap
- Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?, Tim Roberts
- SSE2, memory alignment,
Jippi
- Re: SSE2, memory alignment,
Matt
- Re: SSE2, memory alignment, Jippi
- Re: SSE2, memory alignment,
Matt
- Machine code summary,
bxf
- Re: Machine code summary,
Matt
- Re: Machine code summary,
hutch--
- Re: Machine code summary, Alex McDonald
- Re: Machine code summary,
hutch--
- Re: [Clax86list] Machine code summary, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: Machine code summary, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Machine code summary,
Matt
- SSE2 (movapd, memory alignment),
Jippi
- Re: SSE2 (movapd, memory alignment), hutch--
- Undocumented DIV behavior?,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?,
Jack Klein
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?, Jack Klein
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?, Jim Leonard
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?, nutso fasst
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?, spamtrap
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?, Michael Brown
- Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?,
Jack Klein
- 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard, Lathe_Biosas
- 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon,
nutso fasst
- Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon,
wolfgang kern
- Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon, nutso fasst
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon,
Robert Redelmeier
- Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon, nutso fasst
- Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon,
wolfgang kern
- Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm,
Netocrat
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm,
Matt
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm,
Netocrat
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Jacek Wawrzaszek
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Netocrat
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Matt
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Netocrat
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Matt
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Grumble
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Netocrat
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Netocrat
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm,
Netocrat
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm,
Matt
- How about my paging article ?,
WahJava
- Re: How about my paging article ?,
KingZog
- Re: How about my paging article ?, WahJava
- Re: How about my paging article ?,
KingZog
- Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set,
Jacek Wawrzaszek
- Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set, Terje Mathisen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set, Sevag Krikorian
- Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set, Eric
- Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set,
glen herrmannsfeldt
- Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set, Gerd Isenberg
- Re: [Clax86list] fastest way to check if +1 bit is set,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] fastest way to check if +1 bit is set, Terje Mathisen
- Re: [Clax86list] fastest way to check if +1 bit is set,
Gerd Isenberg
- Re: [Clax86list] fastest way to check if +1 bit is set, Gerd Isenberg
- 68x86 HLAOOP Fabio Bizzetti,
kamel\.biskri
- Re: 68x86 HLAOOP Fabio Bizzetti, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- signed addition,
Shirsoft
- Re: signed addition, Matt
- Re: signed addition,
Jacek Wawrzaszek
- Re: signed addition, Shirsoft
- [LTP ECP] connecting PC to PC, reverse mode, Tomek Gruca
- GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler),
kamel\.biskri
- Re: GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler),
John H. Lindsay
- Re: GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler),
kamel\.biskri
- Re: GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler), John H. Lindsay
- Re: GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler),
kamel\.biskri
- Re: GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler),
John H. Lindsay
- Move text, Utilisateur1
- Clock cycles - where are they?,
Gerhard W. Gruber
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?,
Scott Moore
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?,
wolfgang kern
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?, Eric
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?, wolfgang kern
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?, Bertrand Augereau
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?, wolfgang kern
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?,
wolfgang kern
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?,
Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: Clock cycles - where are they?, Gerhard W. Gruber
- MASM 6 bizarrities,
nutso fasst
- Re: MASM 6 bizarrities,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: MASM 6 bizarrities, nutso fasst
- Re: MASM 6 bizarrities,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Just starting out...,
spamtrap
- Re: Just starting out...,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Just starting out..., Frank Kotler
- Re: Just starting out..., asc
- Re: Just starting out...,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- inline assembly question,
spamtrap
- Re: inline assembly question,
Chris Giese
- Re: inline assembly question, Grumble
- Re: inline assembly question,
Chris Giese
- YARQ: how to reset my pc using ONLY in/out, Piso
- getting absolute difference of mmx byte,
spamtrap
- Re: getting absolute difference of mmx byte,
Jacek Wawrzaszek
- Re: getting absolute difference of mmx byte, Gerd Isenberg
- Re: getting absolute difference of mmx byte,
Jacek Wawrzaszek
- Least instructions to zero-up memory,
rustlingfeet@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Least instructions to zero-up memory,
wolfgang kern
- Re: Least instructions to zero-up memory,
rustlingfeet@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Least instructions to zero-up memory, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: Least instructions to zero-up memory,
rustlingfeet@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Least instructions to zero-up memory,
wolfgang kern
- dll with nasm/ilink32,
Ole Nielsby
- Re: dll with nasm/ilink32,
Ludwig Hähne
- Re: dll with nasm/ilink32, Ole Nielsby
- Re: dll with nasm/ilink32,
Ludwig Hähne
- Hugi Compo 24, Benjamin David Lunt
- cvtps2pi very slow,
spamtrap
- Re: cvtps2pi very slow,
Grumble
- Re: cvtps2pi very slow, spamtrap
- Re: cvtps2pi very slow,
Grumble
- converting 8 byte in MMX register to absolute value, spamtrap
- _setfont and graphics pointers,
jerry
- Re: _setfont and graphics pointers,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: _setfont and graphics pointers,
jerry
- Re: _setfont and graphics pointers, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: _setfont and graphics pointers,
jerry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: _setfont and graphics pointers, Steve
- Re: _setfont and graphics pointers,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Interesting P4 pipeline article ("replay"), Matt
- Question about compiler generated code,
Burkhard Schultheis
- Re: Question about compiler generated code,
Grumble
- Re: Question about compiler generated code,
Burkhard Schultheis
- Re: Question about compiler generated code, Burkhard Schultheis
- Re: Question about compiler generated code,
Burkhard Schultheis
- Re: Question about compiler generated code,
Grumble
- Want your opinion on this project,
Trepper
- Re: Want your opinion on this project, wolfgang kern
- Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?,
RamanChalotra
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?,
Tim Roberts
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?,
RamanChalotra
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?, David J. Craig
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?, RamanChalotra
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?, Tim Roberts
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?, Serge Podgorny (Serj)
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?, Scott J. McCaughrin
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?, Scott J. McCaughrin
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?,
RamanChalotra
- Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?,
Tim Roberts
- Different Syntax for Different Assemblers,
James
- Re: Different Syntax for Different Assemblers, Paul Carter
- Re: Different Syntax for Different Assemblers, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Different Syntax for Different Assemblers, Benjamin David Lunt
- VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform,
RamanChalotra
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform,
hutch--
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform,
RamanChalotra
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform, Grumble
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform, RamanChalotra
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform,
RamanChalotra
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform,
TS
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform, RamanChalotra
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform, Spiro Trikaliotis
- Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform,
hutch--
- nasm gcc basic problem for,
jerry
- Re: nasm gcc basic problem for,
Paul Carter
- Re: nasm gcc basic problem for,
jerry
- Re: nasm gcc basic problem for, Paul Carter
- Re: nasm gcc basic problem for, jerry
- Re: nasm gcc basic problem for,
jerry
- Re: nasm gcc basic problem for, @comcast,net
- Re: nasm gcc basic problem for,
Paul Carter
- URGENT! MASM Problem!,
kernelwiz1
- Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!, Frank Kotler
- Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!,
Mark VB
- Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!,
Frank Kotler
- Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!, Mark VB
- Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!,
Frank Kotler
- Automatic processor dispatch, Mathias Mueller
- Assembler for Dummies, spamtrap
- Index override possible with STOS?,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Matt
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?,
Herman Dullink
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?,
spamtrap
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Herman Dullink
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Frank Kotler
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jacek Wawrzaszek
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jacek Wawrzaszek
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Herman Dullink
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Jim Leonard
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?,
Jim Leonard
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Index override possible with STOS?, Steve
- Where is opcode stored on 8086 ?,
Bhaskar
- Re: Where is opcode stored on 8086 ?, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: Where is opcode stored on 8086 ?, Rene
- Design ASM routine to be called from C,
Cheok Yan Cheng
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C,
Matt
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C,
Jack Klein
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, spamtrap
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, Frank Kotler
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, Nicholas Urie
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, Matt
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, Jonathan Bartlett
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, Jack Klein
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C,
Jack Klein
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, Jack Klein
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, Tim Roberts
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C, T.M. Sommers
- Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C,
Matt
- Problem with masm32 v8.2 - pstold.exe,
Aslan
- Re: Problem with masm32 v8.2 - pstold.exe, Tim Roberts
- Re: Problem with masm32 v8.2 - pstold.exe, hutch--
- MMX instructions and floating point stack,
Sorav Bansal
- Re: MMX instructions and floating point stack,
spamtrap
- Re: MMX instructions and floating point stack, Sorav Bansal
- Re: MMX instructions and floating point stack,
spamtrap
- funny jmp instruction or not?,
spamtrap
- Re: funny jmp instruction or not?,
spamtrap
- Re: funny jmp instruction or not?, hot mail is me
- Re: funny jmp instruction or not?,
spamtrap
- Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future,
Bertrand Augereau
- Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future,
Jerry Coffin
- Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future, Jerry Coffin
- Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future, D. J. Bernstein
- Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future, Jerry Coffin
- Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future,
D. J. Bernstein
- Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future,
Jerry Coffin
- SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition,
spamtrap
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition,
Matt
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition,
hutch--
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition, Cheok Yan Cheng
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition, Eric Albert
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition, Matt
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition, hutch--
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition, Michael Moy
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition, Waldek Hebisch
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition,
hutch--
- Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition,
Matt
- MMX - Trying to packed a value which is not allocated by user, spamtrap
- The speed of C and MMX assembly,
spamtrap
- Re: The speed of C and MMX assembly, Frank de Groot
- Re: The speed of C and MMX assembly, Matt
- Re: The speed of C and MMX assembly, Waldek Hebisch
- Re: SoftIce, spamtrap
- Re: Create afile,
spamtrap
- Re: Create afile, spamtrap
- Re: What is NMAKE.exe used for?,
Matt
- Re: What is NMAKE.exe used for?, spamtrap
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: What is NMAKE.exe used for?, Scott Moore
- diStorm 80x86 disassembler, arkon
- Looking for information on dongle checks,
John
- Re: Looking for information on dongle checks, Doug McIntyre
- Re: Looking for information on dongle checks, Nicholas Sherlock
- Re: Looking for information on dongle checks,
Jason Gurtz
- Re: Looking for information on dongle checks,
Ed Beroset
- Re: Looking for information on dongle checks, Michael Brown
- Re: Looking for information on dongle checks,
Ed Beroset
- Re: Switching back and forth from Protected and Real mode from lesser previlage process, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Get the FAQs,
Clax86
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Get the FAQs, Clax86
- Get the FAQs, Clax86
- Get the FAQs, Clax86
- Field of wheel in assembler,
Włodek
- Re: Field of wheel in assembler,
Tim Roberts
- Re: Field of wheel in assembler,
Wlodek
- Re: Field of wheel in assembler, Tim Roberts
- Re: Field of wheel in assembler, Jerry Coffin
- Re: Field of wheel in assembler,
Wlodek
- Re: Field of wheel in assembler,
Tim Roberts
- Having a 8 byte constant value propagate across MMX register, spamtrap
- iA32 Paging,
Richard Harris
- Re: iA32 Paging,
Jack Klein
- Re: iA32 Paging, Richard Harris
- Re: iA32 Paging,
Jack Klein
- C to NASM - lnkflat problem,
Marcin Balcerzak
- Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem,
IIJIMA Hiromitsu
- Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem,
Marcin Balcerzak
- Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem, IIJIMA Hiromitsu
- Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem, Frank Kotler
- Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem,
Marcin Balcerzak
- Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem,
IIJIMA Hiromitsu
- Looking for John S. Fine,
Richard Harris
- Re: Looking for John S. Fine,
Frank Kotler
- Re: Looking for John S. Fine, Richard Harris
- Re: Looking for John S. Fine,
Frank Kotler
- OS's,
Richard Harris
- Re: OS's, Grumble
- Re: Getting the absolute address of a label in assembly, sorav bansal
- INT 21h,0a,
spamtrap
- Re: INT 21h,0a,
Jason Gurtz
- Re: INT 21h,0a, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: INT 21h,0a,
Jason Gurtz
- Re: nasm : push byte 255 ... more,
Erdemal
- Message not available
- Re: nasm : push byte 255 ... more,
Erdemal
- Re: nasm : push byte 255 ... more, Frank Kotler
- Re: nasm : push byte 255 ... more,
Erdemal
- Message not available
- Re: I'm confused, how page protection works in Linux/Windows/FreeBSD ?, WahJava
- Re: Why do we need FlushInstructionCache() ?, WahJava
- Having trouble posting?,
Clax86
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Having trouble posting?, Clax86
- Having trouble posting?, Clax86
- Having trouble posting?, Clax86
- Having trouble posting?, Clax86
- Re: nasm : push byte 255 >>> signed byte value exceeds bounds,
Erdemal
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: nasm : push byte 255 >>> signed byte value exceeds bounds, Frank Kotler
- Re: nasm : push byte 255 >>> signed byte value exceeds bounds, Chris Giese
- How to compute reciprocal without DIV,
spamtrap
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV, Jack Klein
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV,
Terje Mathisen
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV,
Grumble
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV, Terje Mathisen
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV, spamtrap
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV, prino
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV,
Grumble
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV, Sinan
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV,
Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV, spamtrap
