comp.lang.asm.x86

• Thread Index

---

• Re: clock cycles for a power function
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: clock cycles for a power function
  • From: Maarten Kronenburg
• Re: Machine code summary
  • From: Alex McDonald
• Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: FINIT/FFREE no effect
  • From: Thomas Pototschnig
• clock cycles for a power function
  • From: Aurélien
• Re: SSE2, memory alignment
  • From: Jippi
• FINIT/FFREE no effect
  • From: Thomas Pototschnig
• Re: SSE2 (movapd, memory alignment)
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Machine code summary
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Machine code summary
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: wolfgang kern
• Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: Matt
• Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: Patrick Klos
• Re: [Clax86list] Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Entire GUI operating system in ASM?
  • From: Doug
• Re: [Clax86list] Machine code summary
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: Machine code summary
  • From: Matt
• Re: SSE2, memory alignment
  • From: Matt
• SSE2, memory alignment
  • From: Jippi
• Machine code summary
  • From: bxf
• SSE2 (movapd, memory alignment)
  • From: Jippi
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: Gerhard W. Gruber
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: Clax86
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Netocrat
• Re: [Clax86list] Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: Scott J. McCaughrin
• Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Netocrat
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Grumble
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Matt
• Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Lathe_Biosas
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Horst Gfrerer
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Netocrat
• Re: 68x86 HLAOOP Fabio Bizzetti
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: Scott J. McCaughrin
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Matt
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Matt
• Get the FAQs
  • From: Clax86
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Nicolo Parenti
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Lathe_Biosas
• Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: Michael Brown
• Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Gerd Isenberg
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: nutso fasst
• Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: nutso fasst
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: nutso fasst
• Re: Just starting out...
  • From: asc
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Netocrat
• Undocumented DIV behavior?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• 8253 Timer: Intel Celeron Processor/D865GBF Motherboard
  • From: Lathe_Biosas
• Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon
  • From: nutso fasst
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Jacek Wawrzaszek
• Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: glen herrmannsfeldt
• Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon
  • From: nutso fasst
• Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon
  • From: wolfgang kern
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Netocrat
• Re: How about my paging article ?
  • From: WahJava
• Re: [LTP ECP] connecting PC to PC, reverse mode
  • From: Tomek Gruca
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Matt
• 'Intel' CPU ID code crashes NTVDM on Athlon
  • From: nutso fasst
• Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm
  • From: Netocrat
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: wolfgang kern
• Re: How about my paging article ?
  • From: KingZog
• Re: dll with nasm/ilink32
  • From: Ole Nielsby
• Re: [Clax86list] fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Gerd Isenberg
• Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: signed addition
  • From: Shirsoft
• How about my paging article ?
  • From: WahJava
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Matt
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: wolfgang kern
• Re: YARQ: how to reset my pc using ONLY in/out
  • From: Grumble
• Re: [Clax86list] fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Gerd Isenberg
• Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Eric
• Re: [Clax86list] fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: [LTP ECP] connecting PC to PC, reverse mode
  • From: Eric
• Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Sevag Krikorian
• Re: fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Jacek Wawrzaszek
• Re: signed addition
  • From: Jacek Wawrzaszek
• Re: [Clax86list] fastest way to check if +1 bit is set
  • From: Charles A. Crayne
• Re: YARQ: how to reset my pc using ONLY in/out
  • From: Eric
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: Eric
• Re: signed addition
  • From: Matt
• 68x86 HLAOOP Fabio Bizzetti
  • From: kamel\.biskri
• signed addition
  • From: Shirsoft
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: wolfgang kern
• [LTP ECP] connecting PC to PC, reverse mode
  • From: Tomek Gruca
• Re: GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler)
  • From: John H. Lindsay
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: Maarten Kronenburg
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: Scott Moore
• Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: Waldek Hebisch
• Re: The speed of C and MMX assembly
  • From: Waldek Hebisch
• Re: _setfont and graphics pointers
  • From: Steve
• Re: GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler)
  • From: kamel\.biskri
• Re: inline assembly question
  • From: Grumble
• Re: _setfont and graphics pointers
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: getting absolute difference of mmx byte
  • From: Gerd Isenberg
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler)
  • From: John H. Lindsay
• Re: _setfont and graphics pointers
  • From: jerry
• Re: inline assembly question
  • From: Chris Giese
• GEMA (GenPC Elite Macro Assembler)
  • From: kamel\.biskri
• Re: MASM 6 bizarrities
  • From: nutso fasst
• Move text
  • From: Utilisateur1
• Re: Just starting out...
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Clock cycles - where are they?
  • From: Gerhard W. Gruber
• Re: MASM 6 bizarrities
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Just starting out...
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: Clax86
• MASM 6 bizarrities
  • From: nutso fasst
• Just starting out...
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Least instructions to zero-up memory
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• inline assembly question
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Least instructions to zero-up memory
  • From: rustlingfeet@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: cvtps2pi very slow
  • From: spamtrap
• YARQ: how to reset my pc using ONLY in/out
  • From: Piso
• Re: getting absolute difference of mmx byte
  • From: Jacek Wawrzaszek
• Re: Least instructions to zero-up memory
  • From: wolfgang kern
• Re: dll with nasm/ilink32
  • From: Ludwig Hähne
• getting absolute difference of mmx byte
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Question about compiler generated code
  • From: Burkhard Schultheis
• Least instructions to zero-up memory
  • From: rustlingfeet@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: cvtps2pi very slow
  • From: Grumble
• Re: _setfont and graphics pointers
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: converting 8 byte in MMX register to absolute value
  • From: Gerd Isenberg
• Re: converting 8 byte in MMX register to absolute value
  • From: Matt
• dll with nasm/ilink32
  • From: Ole Nielsby
• Hugi Compo 24
  • From: Benjamin David Lunt
• cvtps2pi very slow
  • From: spamtrap
• converting 8 byte in MMX register to absolute value
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Different Syntax for Different Assemblers
  • From: Paul Carter
• _setfont and graphics pointers
  • From: jerry
• Re: Question about compiler generated code
  • From: Burkhard Schultheis
• Get the FAQs
  • From: Clax86
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: Serge Podgorny (Serj)
• Re: Different Syntax for Different Assemblers
  • From: xyoavx
• Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Herman Dullink
• Re: Question about compiler generated code
  • From: Grumble
• Re: Want your opinion on this project
  • From: wolfgang kern
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: RamanChalotra
• Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: David J. Craig
• Re: Interesting P4 pipeline article ("replay")
  • From: Matt
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: nasm gcc basic problem for
  • From: jerry
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: nasm gcc basic problem for
  • From: @comcast,net
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jacek Wawrzaszek
• Question about compiler generated code
  • From: Burkhard Schultheis
• Want your opinion on this project
  • From: Trepper
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jacek Wawrzaszek
• Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: RamanChalotra
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: RamanChalotra
• Re: nasm gcc basic problem for
  • From: Paul Carter
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Herman Dullink
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: TS
• Re: Different Syntax for Different Assemblers
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Running TSR throuh VC++ on windows Platform ?
  • From: RamanChalotra
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: RamanChalotra
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: Grumble
• Re: nasm gcc basic problem for
  • From: jerry
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: RamanChalotra
• Re: nasm gcc basic problem for
  • From: jerry
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: RamanChalotra
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: Spiro Trikaliotis
• Re: nasm gcc basic problem for
  • From: Paul Carter
• Re: Different Syntax for Different Assemblers
  • From: Paul Carter
• Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!
  • From: Mark VB
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: TS
• Re: Different Syntax for Different Assemblers
  • From: Benjamin David Lunt
• Different Syntax for Different Assemblers
  • From: James
• Re: VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Problem with masm32 v8.2 - pstold.exe
  • From: Aslan
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: Clax86
• VC++ inline aseembly on WIN NT Platform
  • From: RamanChalotra
• nasm gcc basic problem for
  • From: jerry
• Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!
  • From: Mark VB
• Re: URGENT! MASM Problem!
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• URGENT! MASM Problem!
  • From: kernelwiz1
• Automatic processor dispatch
  • From: Mathias Mueller
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Steve
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Herman Dullink
• Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: Michael Moy
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: hutch--
• Assembler for Dummies
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Matt
• Index override possible with STOS?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Where is opcode stored on 8086 ?
  • From: Rene
• Re: Where is opcode stored on 8086 ?
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Where is opcode stored on 8086 ?
  • From: Bhaskar
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Matt
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Jonathan Bartlett
• Get the FAQs
  • From: Clax86
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Nicholas Urie
• Re: Problem with masm32 v8.2 - pstold.exe
  • From: hutch--
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: T.M. Sommers
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Problem with masm32 v8.2 - pstold.exe
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: Eric Albert
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: Matt
• Re: Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Matt
• Design ASM routine to be called from C
  • From: Cheok Yan Cheng
• Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: Cheok Yan Cheng
• Problem with masm32 v8.2 - pstold.exe
  • From: Aslan
• Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future
  • From: Jerry Coffin
• Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: hutch--
• Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future
  • From: Jerry Coffin
• Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: MMX instructions and floating point stack
  • From: Sorav Bansal
• Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future
  • From: Jerry Coffin
• Re: funny jmp instruction or not?
  • From: hot mail is me
• Re: MMX instructions and floating point stack
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: funny jmp instruction or not?
  • From: spamtrap
• MMX instructions and floating point stack
  • From: Sorav Bansal
• funny jmp instruction or not?
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: Matt
• Re: MMX - Trying to packed a value which is not allocated by user
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• Re: X86(Ia32) Asm Future
  • From: Bertrand Augereau
• SSE2 and MMX performace - Almost same when performing integer addition
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: MMX - Trying to packed a value which is not allocated by user
  • From: Matt
• Re: MMX - Trying to packed a value which is not allocated by user
  • From: Herman Dullink
• MMX - Trying to packed a value which is not allocated by user
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: The speed of C and MMX assembly
  • From: Matt
• Re: The speed of C and MMX assembly
  • From: Matt
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: Clax86
• Re: The speed of C and MMX assembly
  • From: bear
• Re: The speed of C and MMX assembly
  • From: Frank de Groot
• Re: Why do we need FlushInstructionCache() ?
  • From: Matt
• The speed of C and MMX assembly
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: SoftIce
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Field of wheel in assembler
  • From: Jerry Coffin
• Re: Create afile
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Looking for information on dongle checks
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Looking for information on dongle checks
  • From: Michael Brown
• Re: Field of wheel in assembler
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Looking for information on dongle checks
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Looking for information on dongle checks
  • From: Ed Beroset
• Re: What is NMAKE.exe used for?
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Create afile
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Looking for information on dongle checks
  • From: Jason Gurtz
• Re: What is NMAKE.exe used for?
  • From: Scott Moore
• Re: Looking for information on dongle checks
  • From: Nicholas Sherlock
• Re: Looking for information on dongle checks
  • From: Doug McIntyre
• Re: Field of wheel in assembler
  • From: Wlodek
• Re: What is NMAKE.exe used for?
  • From: Matt
• diStorm 80x86 disassembler
  • From: arkon
• Looking for information on dongle checks
  • From: John
• Re: INT 21h,0a
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: Switching back and forth from Protected and Real mode from lesser previlage process
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Get the FAQs
  • From: Clax86
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Having a 8 byte constant value propagate across MMX register
  • From: Herman Dullink
• Re: Having a 8 byte constant value propagate across MMX register
  • From: Matt
• Re: Field of wheel in assembler
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Having a 8 byte constant value propagate across MMX register
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Having a 8 byte constant value propagate across MMX register
  • From: dm
• Re: Having a 8 byte constant value propagate across MMX register
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Field of wheel in assembler
  • From: Włodek
• Re: Having a 8 byte constant value propagate across MMX register
  • From: Herman Dullink
• Re: iA32 Paging
  • From: Richard Harris
• Having a 8 byte constant value propagate across MMX register
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: iA32 Paging
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Looking for John S. Fine
  • From: Richard Harris
• iA32 Paging
  • From: Richard Harris
• Re: Looking for John S. Fine
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: nasm : push byte 255 ... more
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem
  • From: IIJIMA Hiromitsu
• Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem
  • From: Marcin Balcerzak
• Re: OS's
  • From: Grumble
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: Maarten Kronenburg
• Re: C to NASM - lnkflat problem
  • From: IIJIMA Hiromitsu
• C to NASM - lnkflat problem
  • From: Marcin Balcerzak
• Re: nasm : push byte 255 ... more
  • From: Erdemal
• Looking for John S. Fine
  • From: Richard Harris
• OS's
  • From: Richard Harris
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: Sinan
• Re: INT 21h,0a
  • From: Jason Gurtz
• Re: Getting the absolute address of a label in assembly
  • From: sorav bansal
• INT 21h,0a
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: Why do we need FlushInstructionCache() ?
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: prino
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: spamtrap
• Re: nasm : push byte 255 ... more
  • From: Erdemal
• Re: I'm confused, how page protection works in Linux/Windows/FreeBSD ?
  • From: WahJava
• Re: Why do we need FlushInstructionCache() ?
  • From: WahJava
• Re: nasm : push byte 255 >>> signed byte value exceeds bounds
  • From: Erdemal
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: Grumble
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: Clax86
• Re: nasm : push byte 255 >>> signed byte value exceeds bounds
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: nasm : push byte 255 >>> signed byte value exceeds bounds
  • From: Chris Giese
• Re: nasm : push byte 255 >>> signed byte value exceeds bounds
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: nasm : push byte 255 >>> signed byte value exceeds bounds
  • From: Erdemal
• How to compute reciprocal without DIV
  • From: spamtrap

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Assembler  > comp.lang.asm.x86  > 2005-06