comp.lang.asm.x86
- Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption,
spamtrap
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption, Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption, f0dder
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption,
f0dder
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption, Jim Leonard
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption,
f0dder
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption, Jim Leonard
- Re: Writing spaghetti code for obfuscation/encryption, David J. Craig
- Vanderpool and Pacifica satisfy Popek and Goldberg virtualization requirements?, spamtrap
- www.devicetools.com - rembedded software resources, spamtrap
- Simple program cwitching thru all video-modes craps-out ...,
R.Wieser
- Re: Simple program cwitching thru all video-modes craps-out ...,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Simple program cwitching thru all video-modes craps-out ...,
R.Wieser
- Re: Simple program cwitching thru all video-modes craps-out ..., Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Simple program cwitching thru all video-modes craps-out ...,
R.Wieser
- Re: Simple program cwitching thru all video-modes craps-out ..., Jim Leonard
- Re: Simple program cwitching thru all video-modes craps-out ...,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- parity check,
Herbert Haas
- Re: parity check, spamtrap
- Re: parity check, Donkey
- Re: parity check,
David J. Craig
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: parity check,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: parity check, David J. Craig
- Re: parity check, f0dder
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: parity check,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: parity check,
Jack Klein
- Re: parity check, Terje Mathisen
- bochs vs real world,
johny_cage
- Re: bochs vs real world, Alex
- <Possible follow-ups>
- bochs vs real world, johny_cage
- Polling input from the mouse,
Bjarke Walling Petersen
- Re: Polling input from the mouse,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Polling input from the mouse,
Bjarke Walling Petersen
- Re: Polling input from the mouse, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Polling input from the mouse,
Bjarke Walling Petersen
- Re: Polling input from the mouse, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Polling input from the mouse,
Bjarke Walling Petersen
- Re: Polling input from the mouse,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Loading a bitmap image,
Galbu
- Re: Loading a bitmap image,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Loading a bitmap image,
Galbu
- Re: Loading a bitmap image, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: Loading a bitmap image, Galbu
- Re: Loading a bitmap image,
Galbu
- Re: Loading a bitmap image,
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Using linux's brk for dynamic memory allocation,
Alex Buell
- Re: [Clax86list] Using linux's brk for dynamic memory allocation, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: Using linux's brk for dynamic memory allocation, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Using linux's brk for dynamic memory allocation,
Jonathan Bartlett
- Re: Using linux's brk for dynamic memory allocation,
Alex Buell
- Re: Using linux's brk for dynamic memory allocation, Claudio Daffra
- Re: Using linux's brk for dynamic memory allocation,
Alex Buell
- HLA macro question?,
spamtrap
- Re: HLA macro question?,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA macro question?,
spamtrap
- Re: HLA macro question?, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA macro question?, spamtrap
- Re: HLA macro question?, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA macro question?, Alex Buell
- Re: HLA macro question?, spamtrap
- Re: HLA macro question?, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA macro question?, spamtrap
- Re: HLA macro question?, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA macro question?, SevagK
- Re: HLA macro question?,
spamtrap
- Re: HLA macro question?,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Problem with program (Pirko's RPSORT),
prino
- Re: Problem with program (Pirko's RPSORT), Terje Mathisen
- Re: Problem with program (Pirko's RPSORT),
SevagK
- Re: Problem with program (Pirko's RPSORT), Robert Redelmeier
- pipeline optimization,
Himanshu
- Re: pipeline optimization,
Donkey
- Re: pipeline optimization,
hutch--
- Re: pipeline optimization, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: pipeline optimization,
hutch--
- Re: pipeline optimization,
wolfgang kern
- Re: pipeline optimization,
f0dder
- Re: pipeline optimization, wolfgang kern
- Re: pipeline optimization, Himanshu
- Re: pipeline optimization,
f0dder
- Re: pipeline optimization,
Donkey
- Re: dual+ processor systems, Matt Taylor
- Relevance of .org in Linux Assembly,
ramakrishhna
- Re: Relevance of .org in Linux Assembly,
Frank Kotler
- Re: Relevance of .org in Linux Assembly,
Alex Buell
- Re: Relevance of .org in Linux Assembly, Frank Kotler
- Re: Relevance of .org in Linux Assembly,
Alex Buell
- Re: Relevance of .org in Linux Assembly, Bill Marcum
- Re: Relevance of .org in Linux Assembly,
Frank Kotler
- Cache identification on INTEL-CPUs,
André Kempe
- Re: Cache identification on INTEL-CPUs, Andreas Grögel
- Reset vector Location for 128K EEPROM,
rama_desd@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Reset vector Location for 128K EEPROM, wolfgang kern
- Re: Reset vector Location for 128K EEPROM, ramakrishhna
- Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe,
dude84
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe,
spamtrap
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, dude84
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe,
hutch--
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, dude84
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, f0dder
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, dude84
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, f0dder
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, Spiro Trikaliotis
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, dude84
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, dude84
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, spamtrap
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, dude84
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe, Donkey
- Re: Windows XP SP2 assembler for launching cmd.exe,
spamtrap
- FASM Assembler project, JGCASEY
- [nasm] accessing hardware from pmode,
johny_cage
- Re: [nasm] accessing hardware from pmode,
Frank Kotler
- Re: accessing hardware from pmode, johny_cage
- Re: accessing hardware from pmode,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: accessing hardware from pmode, Frank Kotler
- Re: accessing hardware from pmode,
johny_cage
- Re: accessing hardware from pmode, johny_cage
- Re: accessing hardware from pmode, Frank Kotler
- Re: [nasm] accessing hardware from pmode,
Frank Kotler
- how to get the segments address and print it in hex,
spamtrap
- Re: how to get the segments address and print it in hex, Alex Buell
- Re: how to get the segments address and print it in hex, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- BIOS option ROMs <-> BIOS legacy interrupts, sijoange
- the LOCK prefix,
Scott J. McCaughrin
- Re: [Clax86list] the LOCK prefix,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] the LOCK prefix, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: the LOCK prefix, wolfgang kern
- Re: [Clax86list] the LOCK prefix,
Charles A. Crayne
- assembler too hard?,
spamtrap
- Re: assembler too hard?,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: assembler too hard?,
spamtrap
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: assembler too hard?, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: assembler too hard?, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: assembler too hard?,
spamtrap
- Re: assembler too hard?,
Charles A. Crayne
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: assembler too hard?, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: assembler too hard?, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: assembler too hard?, f0dder
- Re: assembler too hard?, hutch--
- Re: assembler too hard?,
JGCASEY
- Re: assembler too hard?, Matt C.
- Re: assembler too hard?, JGCASEY
- Re: assembler too hard?, Matt C.
- Re: assembler too hard?, JGCASEY
- Re: runtime BIOS: 128kb,
Bill Leary
- Re: runtime BIOS: 128kb,
sijoange
- Re: runtime BIOS: 128kb, Bill Leary
- Re: runtime BIOS: 128kb,
sijoange
- Re: EBP going crazy,
Bill Marcum
- Re: EBP going crazy, André Kempe
- Re: EBP going crazy, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: EBP going crazy, ¬a\\/b
- Re: [nasm] copying in the same segment, Alex
- Re: [nasm] copying in the same segment,
Frank Kotler
- Re: copying in the same segment,
johny_cage
- Re: copying in the same segment, Frank Kotler
- Re: copying in the same segment, johny_cage
- Re: copying in the same segment,
johny_cage
- Re: String cat algo, Virtanen Antti
- Re: String cat algo,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: String cat algo,
hutch--
- Re: String cat algo, Virtanen Antti
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: String cat algo, Terje Mathisen
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: String cat algo, Terje Mathisen
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: String cat algo, Terje Mathisen
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: String cat algo,
hutch--
- Message not available
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: String cat algo,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: String cat algo, f0dder
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: String cat algo, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: String cat algo, Guga
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: String cat algo, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: String cat algo, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: String cat algo, Alex Buell
- Re: String cat algo, f0dder
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: String cat algo, f0dder
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: String cat algo, f0dder
- Re: String cat algo, hutch--
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: String cat algo,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: String cat algo,
Matt
- Re: String cat algo, Dave Thompson
- Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?,
hutch--
- Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?,
bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Robert Redelmeier
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Tim Roberts
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Grumble
- Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?,
bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Grumble
- Re: Why do I need a stack frame to use %xmm registers?, Grumble
- Re: 64 bit instructions,
bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: 64 bit instructions,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: 64 bit instructions, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: 64 bit instructions, f0dder
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: 64 bit instructions, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: 64 bit instructions, Alex Buell
- Re: [Clax86list] Re: 64 bit instructions,
Charles A. Crayne
- Re: 64 bit instructions, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: 64 bit instructions,
BRG
- Re: 64 bit instructions, Alex Buell
- Re: HLA & device drivers,
Tim Roberts
- Re: HLA & device drivers,
Frank Kotler
- Re: HLA & device drivers, T.M. Sommers
- Re: HLA & device drivers,
spamtrap
- Re: HLA & device drivers, Tim Roberts
- Re: HLA & device drivers, spamtrap
- Re: HLA & device drivers, Tim Roberts
- Re: HLA & device drivers, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA & device drivers,
Frank Kotler
- Re: HLA & device drivers, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Replacing SSE2 instructions with another instruction set in a executable, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Replacing SSE2 instructions with another instruction set in a executable, f0dder
- Re: Replacing SSE2 instructions with another instruction set in a executable,
Daydreamer
- Re: Replacing SSE2 instructions with another instruction set in a executable, Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: general opcode question, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: A stupid question about "STACK SEGMENT", Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: TASM versions, hutch--
- Re: Recommended Dos Assemblers, alex
- Re: Recommended Dos Assemblers, Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: Recommended Dos Assemblers,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Recommended Dos Assemblers, f0dder
- Re: Recommended Dos Assemblers,
wolfgang kern
- Re: Recommended Dos Assemblers, presentt
- Re: Fast xmm register load with copy of 32bit variable, Ludwig Hähne
- Re: Fast xmm register load with copy of 32bit variable, Michael Moy
- Re: protected mode bios: option ROMs,
spamtrap
- Re: protected mode bios: option ROMs, sijoange
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory],
Frank Kotler
- Re: [nasm][video memory],
johny_cage
- Re: [nasm][video memory], Frank Kotler
- Re: [nasm][video memory], Alex Buell
- Re: [nasm][video memory], wolfgang kern
- Re: [nasm][video memory], Alex Buell
- Re: [nasm][video memory], wolfgang kern
- Re: [nasm][video memory], wolfgang kern
- Re: [nasm][video memory], Alex Buell
- Re: [nasm][video memory], wolfgang kern
- Re: [nasm][video memory], Nicholas Sherlock
- Re: [nasm][video memory], Alex Buell
- Re: [nasm][video memory],
johny_cage
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory],
Frank Kotler
- Re: [nasm][video memory],
johny_cage
- Re: [nasm][video memory], Frank Kotler
- Re: [nasm][video memory], Alex
- Re: [nasm][video memory],
johny_cage
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory],
Alex
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory],
Frank Kotler
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory], alex@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory], Frank Kotler
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory], alex
- Re: [nasm][video memory], johny_cage
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory], Frank Kotler
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory], Frank Kotler
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory],
Frank Kotler
- Re: [bochs][nasm][video memory], Alex
- Re: newbie question : linux video memory in text mode,
Claudio Daffra
- Re: newbie question : linux video memory in text mode,
Tim Roberts
- Re: newbie question : linux video memory in text mode, Claudio Daffra
- Re: newbie question : linux video memory in text mode,
Tim Roberts
- Re: Best way to address array of words?,
wolfgang kern
- Re: Best way to address array of words?,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Best way to address array of words?, wolfgang kern
- Re: Best way to address array of words?, spamtrap
- Re: Best way to address array of words?,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Best way to address array of words?, Jerry Coffin
- Re: Help data conversion, Frank Kotler
- Re: Help data conversion, Claudio Daffra
- Re: coprocessor error, Bill Marcum
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc,
Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc,
Claudio Daffra
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc, Claudio Daffra
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc, Claudio Daffra
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc, asm.20.better@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc, Claudio Daffra
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc, Claudio Daffra
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc, T.M. Sommers
- Re: link my asmlib as shared libbrary with gcc,
Claudio Daffra
- Re: Hmm...,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Hmm..., hutch--
- Re: Hmm..., wolfgang kern
- Re: Hmm..., Frank Kotler
- Re: Hmm..., Frank Kotler
- Re: Hmm...,
Frank Kotler
- Re: Hmm..., Alex Buell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Hmm..., Steve
- Re: How declare a function as nested function,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: How declare a function as nested function, dongmonkey1
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed,
Jim Leonard
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed, spamtrap
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed,
Frank Kotler
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed, Frank Kotler
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed, Frank Kotler
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed,
Frank Kotler
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed,
spamtrap
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed, wolfgang kern
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed, johny_cage
- Re: nasm, int 10h, speed,
spamtrap
- Re: rep performance, hutch--
- Re: rep performance, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: rep performance, Tim Roberts
- Re: What operations are done when a function is called, spamtrap
- Re: What operations are done when a function is called,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What operations are done when a function is called,
Claudio Daffra
- Re: What operations are done when a function is called, IIJIMA Hiromitsu
- Re: What operations are done when a function is called, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What operations are done when a function is called, Claudio Daffra
- Re: What operations are done when a function is called,
Claudio Daffra
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Having trouble posting?, Clax86
- Having trouble posting?, Clax86
- Having trouble posting?, Clax86
- Having trouble posting?, Clax86
- Re: HLA Exception (5): Conversion error???,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA Exception (5): Conversion error???,
spamtrap
- Re: HLA Exception (5): Conversion error???, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: HLA Exception (5): Conversion error???, spamtrap
- Re: HLA Exception (5): Conversion error???,
spamtrap
- Re: new bie, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: new bie, Jason Gurtz
- Re: new bie, Betov
- Re: HLA doc [AoA for Linux] error?, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: x86 TSR programming information,
Tim Roberts
- Re: x86 TSR programming information, Alex Buell
- Re: x86 TSR programming information,
spamtrap
- Re: x86 TSR programming information, Alex Buell
- Re: x86 TSR programming information,
Abhi
- Re: x86 TSR programming information, Alex Buell
- Re: nop's in gcc-generated code, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: nop's in gcc-generated code,
Ethan Eade
- Re: nop's in gcc-generated code, Cribble
- Re: newbie seeks info., Matt
- Re: newbie seeks info., spamtrap
- Re: newbie seeks info.,
Jhon Smith
- Re: newbie seeks info., randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Get the FAQs, Clax86
- Get the FAQs, Clax86
- Get the FAQs, Clax86
- Get the FAQs, Clax86
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Implement memcmp function with help from gcc's inline asm, Netocrat
- <Possible follow-ups>
- indirect addressing on PIV's vs static addressing,
Robert Spykerman
- Re: indirect addressing on PIV's vs static addressing, Maarten Kronenburg
- indirect addressing on PIV's vs static addressing,
Robert Spykerman
- Re: indirect addressing on PIV's vs static addressing, Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: Win98 VDM not V86?,
wolfgang kern
- Re: Win98 VDM not V86?,
nutso fasst
- Re: Win98 VDM not V86?, wolfgang kern
- Re: Win98 VDM not V86?, nutso fasst
- Re: Win98 VDM not V86?, wolfgang kern
- Re: Win98 VDM not V86?, nutso fasst
- Re: Win98 VDM not V86?, wolfgang kern
- Re: Win98 VDM not V86?,
nutso fasst
- Re: need list of x86 opcodes,
robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: need list of x86 opcodes, Betov
- Re: need list of x86 opcodes, Bush is a Fascist
- Re: need list of x86 opcodes,
Donkey
- Re: need list of x86 opcodes,
Bush is a Fascist
- Re: need list of x86 opcodes, wolfgang kern
- Re: need list of x86 opcodes,
Bush is a Fascist
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: need list of x86 opcodes, Maarten Kronenburg
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search,
wolfgang kern
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search,
Ole Nielsby
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search, wolfgang kern
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search, hutch--
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search,
Ole Nielsby
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search,
randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search, Tim Roberts
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search, Jim Leonard
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search,
Jim Leonard
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search,
Matt
- Re: Slow string search/fast binary search, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Hexadecimal words, Alex Buell
- Re: Hexadecimal words, Alex Buell