Re: improve strlen
- From: "jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Hello. Your latest optimizations make the assembly version _slower_
than the C++ version here. The original code was ~6% faster, now it is
~15% slower.
Unrolling like that kinda kills branch prediction, I suppose. And burns
code/tracecache for no real gain..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: improve strlen
- From: randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: improve strlen
- From: hutch--
- Re: improve strlen
- References:
- improve strlen
- From: Claudio Daffra
- Re: improve strlen
- From: spamtrap
- Re: improve strlen
- From: hutch--
- Re: improve strlen
- From: spamtrap
- Re: improve strlen
- From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: improve strlen
- From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: improve strlen
- From: jukka@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: improve strlen
- From: hutch--
- improve strlen
- Prev by Date: Having trouble posting?
- Next by Date: Re: compiler generated output
- Previous by thread: Re: improve strlen
- Next by thread: Re: improve strlen
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|