Re: compiler generated output
- From: Tim Roberts <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 03:16:52 +0000 (UTC)
Spiro Trikaliotis <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>BTW: The code from gcc used cltd. Is it really better than cdq?
They are the same. "cltd" is just the way gcc spells the instruction that
Intel spells "cdq", which is opcode 0x99. gas happens to accept both.
--
- Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
.
- References:
- Re: compiler generated output
- From: Skarmander
- Re: compiler generated output
- From: Spiro Trikaliotis
- Re: compiler generated output
- From: Skarmander
- Re: compiler generated output
- From: Spiro Trikaliotis
- Re: compiler generated output
- Prev by Date: Re: Why gcc translate a c program into assemble as follow
- Next by Date: Re: The never ending assembly vs. HLL war
- Previous by thread: Re: compiler generated output
- Next by thread: Re: compiler generated output
- Index(es):