Re: Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- From: "Nicolo Parenti" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:50:24 -0500
Chris Martens wrote:
> Yeah, I thought of that at first, but that would require more hand
> editing than I would like to do. This way is faster for what I need to
> do (this is very time-critical), and if I happen to have an operation
> that takes more than 64 bytes to implement, than it should probably be
> simpler. Keeps me sharp, that way.
Well, of course you should do what you like, as long as it works, but I can't see how a jump table requires any 'hand editing', whatever that means exactly. In fact it's less work, and runs faster as well. The assembler does all the work of keeping track of the addresses, and you use only the space you need. But, chacun a son gout.
Good luck.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- From: hutch--
- Re: Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- References:
- Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- From: Chris Martens
- Re: Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- From: Nicolo Parenti
- Re: Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- From: Chris Martens
- Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- Prev by Date: Re: varargs in C (AMD64 architecture)
- Next by Date: Re: Page flipping on LFB in protected mode...how??!?!
- Previous by thread: Re: Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- Next by thread: Re: Uniform spacing of labels in MASM32
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|