Re: why LIDT needed in Real Mode?
- From: Bob Smith <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:02:16 GMT
On 12/30/2005 2:54 AM, Wendy E. McCaughrin wrote:
I note in much working Pmode code that a necessary part of the transition back to Real Mode is: LIDT [RM_IDT], where `RM_IDT' is a descriptor for an IDT with limit = 64K and base-address = 0, coinciding with the Real-Mode IVT. Why is this necessary, since Real Mode does not use the IDTR? Or does it?
As noted, RM does use the IDT.
FWIW, you can read more about the transition from PM to RM at
http://www.sudleyplace.com/pmtorm.html
-- _________________________________________ Bob Smith -- bsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx a.k.a. bsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To reply to me directly, delete "despam".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why LIDT needed in Real Mode?
- From: J.C. Roberts
- Re: why LIDT needed in Real Mode?
- References:
- why LIDT needed in Real Mode?
- From: Wendy E. McCaughrin
- why LIDT needed in Real Mode?
- Prev by Date: Re: Basic Floppy Disk loader help.
- Next by Date: Re: why LIDT needed in Real Mode?
- Previous by thread: Re: why LIDT needed in Real Mode?
- Next by thread: Re: why LIDT needed in Real Mode?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|