Re: Syscall interface
- From: Alex Buell <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:28:35 +0100
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:56:00 +0100 "Thomas Worthington"
<spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
Sorry for forgetting to mention it was Linux.
Unfortunately the two links you gave are many years out of date now
and deal with Linux 1.2 and 2.2 which only included the old int 0x80
method.
Really?
It's fully supported in 2.4 and 2.6. I ought to know, I've written
several utility routines using NASM which works fine!
--
http://www.munted.org.uk
Take a nap, it saves lives.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Syscall interface
- From: Thomas Worthington
- Re: Syscall interface
- References:
- Syscall interface
- From: Thomas Worthington
- Re: Syscall interface
- From: Rod Pemberton
- Re: Syscall interface
- From: Thomas Worthington
- Syscall interface
- Prev by Date: Re: [Clax86list] Syscall interface
- Next by Date: Re: Syscall interface
- Previous by thread: Re: Syscall interface
- Next by thread: Re: Syscall interface
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|