Re: Syscall interface
- From: "Thomas Worthington" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:41:22 +0100
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:28:35 +0100, Alex Buell <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:56:00 +0100 "Thomas Worthington"
<spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> waved a wand and this message magically appeared:
Sorry for forgetting to mention it was Linux.
Unfortunately the two links you gave are many years out of date now
and deal with Linux 1.2 and 2.2 which only included the old int 0x80
method.
Really?
It's fully supported in 2.4 and 2.6. I ought to know, I've written
several utility routines using NASM which works fine!
Int 0x80 is supported in all versions; the new sysentry/vsyscall is what I was referring to as not being in 1.2 and 2.2. Int 0x80 is what I've used up to now too.
TW
.
- References:
- Syscall interface
- From: Thomas Worthington
- Re: Syscall interface
- From: Rod Pemberton
- Re: Syscall interface
- From: Thomas Worthington
- Re: Syscall interface
- From: Alex Buell
- Syscall interface
- Prev by Date: Re: Syscall interface
- Next by Date: Re: CISC vs RISC concepts -- from an assembly view
- Previous by thread: Re: Syscall interface
- Next by thread: Re: [Clax86list] Syscall interface
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|