comp.lang.asm.x86

• Date Index

---

• How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Lighter
  • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Slor
  • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Robert Redelmeier
      • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Rod Pemberton
  • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, spamtrap
    • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Donald Harris
      • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
  • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Mark_Larson
    • Re: How to reboot a computer immediately by programming?, Rod Pemberton
• PC Assembly Language book now available in Italian, Paul Carter
  • Re: PC Assembly Language book now available in Italian, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Why do Intel's processors provide four debug registers rather than only one?, Lighter
  • Re: Why do Intel's processors provide four debug registers rather than only one?, Jerry Coffin
    • Re: Why do Intel's processors provide four debug registers rather than only one?, Lighter
  • Re: Why do Intel's processors provide four debug registers rather than only one?, James T. White
  • Re: Why do Intel's processors provide four debug registers rather than only one?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why do Intel's processors provide four debug registers rather than only one?, Charles A. Crayne
    • Re: Why do Intel's processors provide four debug registers rather than only one?, Tim Roberts
  • Re: Why do Intel's processors provide four debug registers rather than only one?, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trying to design low level hard disk manipulation program, Jim Higgins
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Trying to design low level hard disk manipulation program, spamtrap
  • Re: Trying to design low level hard disk manipulation program, spamtrap
• How to create a library that detects the processor and uses SIMD instructions as necessary, calyth
  • Re: How to create a library that detects the processor and uses SIMD instructions as necessary, ldb
    • Re: How to create a library that detects the processor and uses SIMD instructions as necessary, Tim Roberts
  • Re: How to create a library that detects the processor and uses SIMD instructions as necessary, Bjarni Juliusson
  • Re: How to create a library that detects the processor and uses SIMD instructions as necessary, Terje Mathisen
  • Re: How to create a library that detects the processor and uses SIMD instructions as necessary, Daniel M. Pfeffer
• How to generate a #SMI?, Lighter
  • Re: How to generate a #SMI?, Alexei A. Frounze
  • Re: How to generate a #SMI?, Mark_Larson
  • Re: How to generate a #SMI?, Michael Tippach
• IA64 and VLIW, waltbrad
  • Re: IA64 and VLIW, Tim Roberts
    • Re: IA64 and VLIW, Phil Carmody
• Does the addressable physical memory range depend on which slots are occupied by the memory?, Lighter
  • Re: Does the addressable physical memory range depend on which slots are occupied by the memory?, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
  • Re: Does the addressable physical memory range depend on which slots are occupied by the memory?, Tim Roberts
• get cl number of bytes, Benjamin David Lunt
  • Re: get cl number of bytes, Rod Pemberton
    • Message not available
      • Re: get cl number of bytes, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: get cl number of bytes, Benjamin David Lunt
  • Re: get cl number of bytes, Cranky
    • Re: get cl number of bytes, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: get cl number of bytes, Bob Masta
      • Re: get cl number of bytes, Rod Pemberton
• floating point representation, waltbrad
  • Re: floating point representation, Nicolo Parenti
  • Re: floating point representation, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: floating point representation, Sebastian Biallas
  • Re: floating point representation, Robert Redelmeier
    • Re: floating point representation, waltbrad
• Is there nasm.el for Emacs?, jronald
  • Re: Is there nasm.el for Emacs?, Frank Kotler
• extracting function parametrs from stack ., katy
  • Re: extracting function parametrs from stack ., Tim Roberts
• Hex to ascii, Displacer
  • Re: Hex to ascii, Robert Redelmeier
    • Re: Hex to ascii, spamtrap
    • Re: Hex to ascii, Displacer
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Hex to ascii, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Robert Redelmeier
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Jean-François Michaud
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Jean-François Michaud
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hex to ascii, spamtrap
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Robert Redelmeier
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Robert Redelmeier
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Robert Redelmeier
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Jean-François Michaud
      • Re: Hex to ascii, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: Hex to ascii, Displacer
• SWAT remote debug conn?, spamtrap
• Intel binned trace cache?, runt
  • Re: Intel binned trace cache?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Intel binned trace cache?, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
      • Re: Intel binned trace cache?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Intel binned trace cache?, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
      • Re: Intel binned trace cache?, chrisj
• v86 resources, Rod Pemberton
• BIOS in Protected Mode, Dan
  • Re: BIOS in Protected Mode, Alexei A. Frounze
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • BIOS in Protected Mode, Dan
• about address space, spamtrap
  • Re: about address space, Bjarni Juliusson
• Re: Recommend a project., spamtrap
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Recommend a project., Jerry Coffin
• move data, spamtrap
  • Re: move data, Bjarni Juliusson
  • Re: move data, Phil Carmody
  • Re: move data, MQ
    • Re: move data, William J. Leary Jr.
    • Re: move data, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: move data, Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
      • Re: move data, William J. Leary Jr.
      • Re: move data, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: move data, Bjarni Juliusson
      • Re: move data, William J. Leary Jr.
      • Re: move data, Dave Thompson
  • Re: move data, Dan
  • Re: move data, Melvin Klassen
• Is EMMS required in a C-style function call using MMX instructions?, calyth
  • Re: Is EMMS required in a C-style function call using MMX instructions?, Tim Roberts
    • Re: Is EMMS required in a C-style function call using MMX instructions?, calyth
• assembly for 64 bit processors, 466
  • Re: assembly for 64 bit processors, Dick Wesseling
• programming FDD controller..., spamtrap
  • Re: programming FDD controller..., spamtrap
  • Re: programming FDD controller..., Spiro Trikaliotis
    • Re: programming FDD controller..., TemiR
      • Re: programming FDD controller..., Tim Roberts
      • Re: programming FDD controller..., spamtrap
      • Re: programming FDD controller..., TemiR
      • Re: programming FDD controller..., spamtrap
• Using assembly and java to pull system information?, spamtrap
  • Re: Using assembly and java to pull system information?, spamtrap
  • Re: Using assembly and java to pull system information?, Jean-François Michaud
• Re: link error while using 'ld' under linux..., Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: link error while using 'ld' under linux..., Frank Kotler
    • Re: link error while using 'ld' under linux..., JianYing
• Having trouble posting?, Clax86
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Having trouble posting?, Clax86
  • Having trouble posting?, Clax86
  • Having trouble posting?, Clax86
• processor compatibility map ?, Toon Knapen
  • Re: processor compatibility map ?, Sebastian Biallas
  • Re: processor compatibility map ?, Mark_Larson
    • Re: processor compatibility map ?, Mark_Larson
• storage of real 32 bit single presicion, waltbrad
  • Re: storage of real 32 bit single presicion, spamtrap
    • Re: storage of real 32 bit single presicion, waltbrad
  • Re: storage of real 32 bit single presicion, 8L45T3R
    • Re: storage of real 32 bit single presicion, waltbrad
  • Re: storage of real 32 bit single presicion, Herbert Glarner
• Get the FAQs, Clax86
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Get the FAQs, Clax86
  • Get the FAQs, Clax86
  • Get the FAQs, Clax86
• How to interpret DS and CS, sleeper
  • Re: How to interpret DS and CS, Frank Kotler
  • Re: How to interpret DS and CS, Tim Roberts
• Write on a hard disk, Langdon
  • Re: Write on a hard disk, Nicholas Sherlock
  • Re: Write on a hard disk, Felix von Leitner
    • Re: Write on a hard disk, Patrick Klos
      • Re: Write on a hard disk, Alexei A. Frounze
    • Re: Write on a hard disk, Cranky
      • Re: Write on a hard disk, Felix von Leitner
      • Re: Write on a hard disk, Langdon
• Creating a Disassembler..., sleeper
  • Re: Creating a Disassembler..., Rod Pemberton
    • Re: Creating a Disassembler..., sleeper
      • Re: Creating a Disassembler..., Rod Pemberton
• Simple question about division by two and shifts (asm newb), spamtrap
  • Re: Simple question about division by two and shifts (asm newb), Bjarni Juliusson
  • Re: Simple question about division by two and shifts (asm newb), Alexei A. Frounze
  • Re: Simple question about division by two and shifts (asm newb), spamtrap
  • Re: Simple question about division by two and shifts (asm newb), Frank Kotler
• 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
  • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
    • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Robert Redelmeier
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
    • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Alexei A. Frounze
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Rod Pemberton
    • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, William J. Leary Jr.
    • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, spamtrap
    • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Rod Pemberton
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Nicholas Sherlock
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Bob Masta
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Rod Pemberton
  • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Terje Mathisen
    • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Samuel Stearley
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Rod Pemberton
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Steve
  • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Steve
    • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Terje Mathisen
      • Re: 8088 LZSS+RLE decompression: Can this be improved?, Jim Leonard
• A couple of questions regarding registers etc..., spamtrap
  • Re: A couple of questions regarding registers etc..., Rod Pemberton
    • Re: A couple of questions regarding registers etc..., Bjarni Juliusson
      • Re: A couple of questions regarding registers etc..., Rod Pemberton
    • Re: A couple of questions regarding registers etc..., spamtrap
    • Re: A couple of questions regarding registers etc..., spamtrap
  • Re: A couple of questions regarding registers etc..., Tim Roberts
• Re: Faster HexToBuffer Routines, Rod Pemberton
• mov ax, seg seg002, Displacer
  • Re: mov ax, seg seg002, spamtrap
• Re: I feel stupid... "Invalid combination of opcode and operand", Jean-François Michaud
• alignment memory access to 4 bytes, Alexander Krizhanovsky
  • Re: alignment memory access to 4 bytes, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• What would happen if the addressed memory doesn't exist?, Lighter
  • Re: What would happen if the addressed memory doesn't exist?, Alexei A. Frounze
  • Re: What would happen if the addressed memory doesn't exist?, Tim Roberts

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

coding.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Assembler  > comp.lang.asm.x86  > 2006-09