Re: [Clax86list] Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- From: Frank Kotler <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 04:01:45 -0500
Charles A. Crayne wrote:
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:03:00 -0500
Frank Kotler <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:(why the hell can't I find "itoa" in the man pages???)
Probably because the man pages spells it "sprintf",
Yipes! Isn't that dangerous? It was "sprintf" that allowed the buffer overflow in Nasm - had to replace it with "snprintf". Well, won't be a problem here...
Best,
Frank
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Clax86list] Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: [Clax86list] Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- References:
- Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- From: Shay
- Re: Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [Clax86list] Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- From: Charles A. Crayne
- Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- Prev by Date: Re: Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- Next by Date: Re: Confused by Intel's Opcode docs
- Previous by thread: Re: [Clax86list] Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- Next by thread: Re: [Clax86list] Feedback please (Linux, NASM code)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|