Re: very small code
- From: "James Van Buskirk" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:32:01 -0600
"Sebastian Biallas" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5jlcrfF5o4kU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Another one is 'cdq'. This works only if the MSB of ax is 0.
What's wrong with 'xchg ax, dx', exchanging the (zero) contents of
ax with dx?
--
write(*,*) transfer((/17.392111325966148d0,6.5794487871554595D-85, &
6.0134700243160014d-154/),(/'x'/)); end
.
- References:
- very small code
- From: almas
- Re: very small code
- From: Jerry Coffin
- Re: very small code
- From: Terje Mathisen
- Re: very small code
- From: Sebastian Biallas
- very small code
- Prev by Date: Re: timing code the possibly most accurate way in an Intel Box?
- Next by Date: Re: call stack's order of parameters
- Previous by thread: Re: very small code
- Next by thread: small program
- Index(es):
