Re: Which Assembler?


Ratch asked:

"Betov" wrote:
....
The problem, when being late on an answer, is that it becomes more
and more difficult hide the reality, which is, for example, that
the OP might have already taken a look by himself, and seen that
RosAsm is the one and only Assembler, coming with an integrated
Source Level Debugger, dynamic break-points, memory scanner, and
all that stuff.

Doesn't matter what add-me-ons RosAsm (name stolen from another
development group) features. If it does not output exactly what the
programmer specifies, then it is not an assembler.
Can anyone tell me if his program does that? Ratch

RosAsm produces only the PE-header by itself, everthing else incl. the
decision for using HL-structs&macros is under control of the programmer.

And the often heard missing Link-feature in RosAsm is just valid for HLL
C-source LIBs, I don't have any problems to merge KESYS-produced binaries
into a RosAsm created executable.

__
wolfgang





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Which Assembler?
    ... Ratch asked: ... RosAsm is the one and only Assembler, ... RosAsm produces only the PE-header by itself, ... decision for using HL-structs¯os is under control of the programmer. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Using IDA Pro v4.3
    ... last week i was working on a FASM ... this is not the way RosAsm Assembler - which is not a FULL ... all by itself ("in the back of the programmer", if you like), ... Assembler, not particulary designed for outputing PE files. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Will HLA2.0 Support rosasm?
    ... it is Rene that always refers to me as "master". ... Flex, Bison, and Delphi programmer (and fairly decent at other languages, ... Maybe RosAsm will even be "auto-compiling" on ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: .EXE -> .ASM -> .EXE
    ... RosAsm, I have to Cut&Paste the code. ... are developping a LibScanner, in Assembly form, without ... the associated Toys. ... own Binary, as long as you are an Assembly Programmer, ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Editors
    ... There are two ways to access content in your RosAsm ... pedantic, I could claim that your "protection" is, at best, 50% effective ... I don't think a programmer will miss such errors :-) ... This is why i recommend, above, to start RosAsm PEs ...
    (alt.lang.asm)