comp.lang.asm.x86

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: referring to segment offsets in read address mode
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: Bob Masta
• referring to segment offsets in read address mode
  • From: Brian Phillips
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: [Clax86list] Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: nbaker2328
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: nbaker2328
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: nbaker2328
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: DaveR
• Re: [Clax86list] Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: Bob Masta
• Re: GNU Assembler (GAS) query
  • From: Timothy Baldwin
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: DaveR
• Re: Branch prediction
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Branch prediction
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: [Clax86list] Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: DaveR
• Re: Why BIOS maps in range 0x000F0000-0x000FFFF ?
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: [Clax86list] Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: GNU Assembler (GAS) query
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: GNU Assembler (GAS) query
  • From: DJ Delorie
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: gerotica
• Re: Setting IOPL of a Procedure
  • From: Jason Burgon
• Re: Asm for Windows
  • From: Muscipula
• Setting IOPL of a Procedure
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Why BIOS maps in range 0x000F0000-0x000FFFF ?
  • From: Lalatendu Das
• GNU Assembler (GAS) query
  • From: thisismyidentity
• Re: Asm for Windows
  • From: Bob Masta
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Bob Masta
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: comp.lang.asm.x86
• Asm for Windows
  • From: Muscipula
• Re: Branch prediction
  • From: Muscipula
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: pete
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: nbaker2328
• Re: Branch prediction
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Cause IRQ5 programmatically
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: Terence
• Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: Alex Buell
• Cause IRQ5 programmatically
  • From: gerotica
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Jumping into middle of instruction
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: s_dubrovich
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: gerotica
• Branch prediction
  • From: Muscipula
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Bob Masta
• Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: DaveR
• Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: Alex Buell
• Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: Alex Buell
• Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Can 64 bit Vista support a 32 bit application with 4 GB?
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: spim-like x86 simulator
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: nbaker2328
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: nbaker2328
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: DaveR
• Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: nbaker2328
• Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
  • From: DaveR
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• MASM ASSUME directives...
  • From: Alex Buell
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Stephen Pelc
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Bob Masta
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: Jason Burgon
• Get the FAQs
  • From: comp.lang.asm.x86
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: camille@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: gerotica
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: Jason Burgon
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: gerotica
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: Jason Burgon
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: Jason Burgon
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: gerotica
• Switch from protected mode to real mode
  • From: gerotica
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: Jason Burgon
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: gerotica
• Re: Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Can 64 bit Vista support a 32 bit application with 4 GB?
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: [Clax86list] Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Pop Tart
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Gil Hamilton
• Disk I/O, BIOS, dosemu, FreeDOS, linux host with Virtual Machines
  • From: Pop Tart
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Pop Tart
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: gerotica
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Real mode int from protected mode and back
  • From: gerotica
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Brian Phillips
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: comp.lang.asm.x86
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Brian Phillips
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Brian Phillips
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Terence
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• 16 bit dos debug options?
  • From: Pop Tart
• Re: multiple interrupts between cli and sti
  • From: Cyril Novikov
• HLA v1.101 is now available on Webster
  • From: rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Jim Leonard
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Alex Buell
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Jason Burgon
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Noob
• Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Alex Buell
• Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
  • From: Elcaro Nosille
• Re: file io in nasm
  • From: Hans Mull
• Re: Get BIOS vendor/version/date and Machine serial/model?
  • From: junkoi
• Get the FAQs
  • From: comp.lang.asm.x86
• Re: file io in nasm
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: multiple interrupts between cli and sti
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: multiple interrupts between cli and sti
  • From: Jason Burgon
• Re: multiple interrupts between cli and sti
  • From: Cyril Novikov
• Re: [Clax86list] file io in nasm
  • From: Charles Crayne
• file io in nasm
  • From: Karl
• multiple interrupts between cli and sti
  • From: Andriy Gapon
• Re: NASm Command Line Tutorial
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Get BIOS vendor/version/date and Machine serial/model?
  • From: Esra Sdrawkcab
• Re: Get BIOS vendor/version/date and Machine serial/model?
  • From: Terence
• NASm Command Line Tutorial
  • From: Hans Mull
• Re: Get BIOS vendor/version/date and Machine serial/model?
  • From: Chris Giese
• Re: Get BIOS vendor/version/date and Machine serial/model?
  • From: தும்பை Jram
• Re: Get BIOS vendor/version/date and Machine serial/model?
  • From: Esra Sdrawkcab
• Re: Get BIOS vendor/version/date and Machine serial/model?
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Get BIOS vendor/version/date and Machine serial/model?
  • From: junkoi
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: GAS-Intel on Windows (MinGW)
  • From: Robert Redelmeier
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: comp.lang.asm.x86
• Re: GAS-Intel on Windows (MinGW)
  • From: nbaker2328
• Re: GAS-Intel on Windows (MinGW)
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: GAS-Intel on Windows (MinGW)
  • From: nbaker2328
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Gil Hamilton
• Re: Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: GAS-Intel on Windows (MinGW)
  • From: Frank Kotler
• GAS-Intel on Windows (MinGW)
  • From: yaugin
• Re: [Clax86list] Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: Display numbers in IEEE format
  • From: Spoon
• Re: Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Jerome H. Fine
• Get the FAQs
  • From: comp.lang.asm.x86
• Re: Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Alex Buell
• Re: How does the REP INSB instruction works?
  • From: xmllmx
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: dis-assembling
  • From: Terence
• Re: dis-assembling
  • From: Terence
• Re: dis-assembling
  • From: Terence
• Re: PUSH reg32
  • From: Mike Gonta
• Re: How does the REP INSB instruction works?
  • From: DJ Delorie
• Re: How does the REP INSB instruction works?
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• Re: dis-assembling
  • From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
• Re: How does the REP INSB instruction works?
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• How does the REP INSB instruction works?
  • From: xmllmx
• dis-assembling
  • From: Terence
• Re: Display numbers in IEEE format
  • From: Wolfgang Kern
• aeBIOS on Linux
  • From: Mike Gonta
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Dick Wesseling
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Dick Wesseling
• Re: Problem with GNU AS
  • From: Timothy Baldwin
• Re: Error in referencing external label
  • From: Timothy Baldwin
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Timothy Baldwin
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Gil Hamilton
• Re: Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Alex Buell
• PUSH reg32
  • From: cod
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: [Clax86list] Error in referencing external label
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Dick Wesseling
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [Clax86list] Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [Clax86list] Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Bob Masta
• Having trouble posting?
  • From: comp.lang.asm.x86
• Re: [Clax86list] Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: James Van Buskirk
• Re: GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE
  • From: cmk128
• Re: Error in referencing external label
  • From: junkoi
• Re: [Clax86list] Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE
  • From: Ratch
• Re: [Clax86list] GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: Error in referencing external label
  • From: Timothy Baldwin
• Re: [Clax86list] Error in referencing external label
  • From: Jerome H. Fine
• GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE
  • From: cmk128
• Re: SSE - find max in 5 elements neighbor
  • From: Terje Mathisen
• Re: Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: [Clax86list] Error in referencing external label
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: [Clax86list] Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Charles Crayne
• Re: Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
  • From: Slor
• Re: Error in referencing external label
  • From: Jerome H. Fine
• Re: variable in 16bit mode?
  • From: Bill Marcum
• SSE - find max in 5 elements neighbor
  • From: finecur
• Re: Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Get the FAQs
  • From: comp.lang.asm.x86
• Re: Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: Alexei A. Frounze
• Re: Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: Hard Disk Manufacturer Serial Number in User Mode
  • From: Lynn McGuire
• Re: TYPE and SIZE Equivalent in NASM?
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: TYPE and SIZE Equivalent in NASM?
  • From: Tim Roberts
• Detecting V8086 Mode
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Excution Time in Cycles on Different Processors
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: Hard Disk Manufacturer Serial Number in User Mode
  • From: Juergen Beisert
• Re: Directly Reading/Writing to Disk
  • From: Juergen Beisert
• Hard Disk Manufacturer Serial Number in User Mode
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Directly Reading/Writing to Disk
  • From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Error in referencing external label
  • From: H. Peter Anvin
• Re: Error in referencing external label
  • From: Frank Kotler
• Re: generic assembly
  • From: Rod Pemberton
• Re: Manuals needing a good home
  • From: ArarghMail801NOSPAM
• Re: Manuals needing a good home
  • From: Slor
• Error in referencing external label
  • From: junkoi
• Re: Another newbie question - returning LPT port via ASM
  • From: ArarghMail801NOSPAM

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(13)