Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- From: Tim Roberts <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 23:18:24 GMT
Gil Hamilton <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I believe Windows has an equivalent mechanism though I haven't done any
Windows kernel programming in a very long time.
Windows does have kernel-mode threads, but in Windows a "thread" and a
"process" are very different things. In Linux, the line between those two
concepts is rather fuzzy.
A kernel-mode thread in Windows actually belongs to the system process,
which is just like every other process.
--
Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- From: Gil Hamilton
- Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- References:
- Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [Clax86list] Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- From: Charles Crayne
- Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- From: mybwpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- From: Gil Hamilton
- Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- Prev by Date: Re: Can WXP handle 4 GB of Physical Memory
- Next by Date: Re: How does the REP INSB instruction works?
- Previous by thread: Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- Next by thread: Re: Accessing Physical Memory & Other Process's Address Space
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|