Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- From: Tim Roberts <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:05:12 GMT
gerotica <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
f000:7250 is inside bios... 000f:7250 is not... right?
It said "eip = 000f7250". That means it's talking about a linear address.
Linear address 000f7250 is f000:7250 in real mode.
Well, if im wrong, then... Interesting... maybe some bios int call
from c file routines...?
Possible.
DOS c++.. I mean Im compiling the ISR using the old MS-DOS c++ 16 bit
compiler... I really don´t know how to explain it better...
There is no "MS-DOS c++ compiler". Do you mean Microsoft Visual C++ 1.52?
Or something older than that, like Microsoft C 7.00? Actually, I don't
think it matters.
I think my biggest problem here is not understand the whole concept of
DPMI. The first idea was just to make a int call to my ISR, a pure int
call using the registers as parameters... I think it would work ok if
i didnt need to make file manipulations inside my ISR, am i right?
No, not at all. You're in 32-bit protect mode. A software interrupt in
protect mode goes through the IDT and expects a protect mode handler. To
invoke a 16-bit real mode ISR, you're going to need DPMI.
Well, the workaround was to make the call using DPMI int, what im
doing now. But i dont understand the parameters needed for int 31h
300h... That pointer to a registers structure... Can it be null? Can
I use the stack to pass the parameters to the ISR?
No, you must supply the registers. It's very likely that your 32-bit stack
is not mapped into the lower megabyte of physical memory, and as such would
not be available in real mode. If you set SS:SP to 0, DPMI will set up an
empty stack for you, which is probably what you want.
--
Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- From: gerotica
- Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- References:
- Real mode int from protected mode and back
- From: gerotica
- Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- From: gerotica
- Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- From: gerotica
- Real mode int from protected mode and back
- Prev by Date: Re: spim-like x86 simulator
- Next by Date: Re: Can 64 bit Vista support a 32 bit application with 4 GB?
- Previous by thread: Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- Next by thread: Re: Real mode int from protected mode and back
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|