Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
- From: Alex Buell <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:39:38 +0000
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:34:33 -0600, I waved a wand and this message
magically appears in front of ArarghMail802NOSPAM:
MASM 5.10 doesn't appear to like above at all. So, which versions
does?
There was a "custom" version of MASM 5.10 that shipped with the
Windows 386 and Windows 3.x DDKs specifically for assembling VxDs.
It understood this.
Sure enough. It identifies itself as 5.10B.
It took me a while to find a copy of the win 31 ddk, though. :-)
2 more versions of MASM to add to my collection. That makes 15.
Also found an 'LE' linker. :-)
Yup, bloody M$ modified 5.10B MASM but didn't increment the version to
assemble these VxDs. Quite why they didn't put their modifications into
the mainline MASM version is beyond me..
--
http://www.munted.org.uk
Fearsome grindings.
.
- References:
- MASM ASSUME directives...
- From: Alex Buell
- Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
- From: Tim Roberts
- Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
- From: ArarghMail802NOSPAM
- MASM ASSUME directives...
- Prev by Date: Cause IRQ5 programmatically
- Next by Date: Re: Jumping into middle of instruction
- Previous by thread: Re: MASM ASSUME directives...
- Next by thread: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|