Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: nbaker2328 <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:50:12 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 27, 9:25 pm, Charles Crayne <spamt...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have never [deliberately] tried mixing elements from different
releases, nor do I recall the issue being discussed, but I don't think
that it is a good idea.
There is generally no problem resulting from mixing different library
releases with the compiler. It does, however, make things more
difficult when one mixes things and expects others to be able to do a
"remote diagnosis" but does not reveal all of the ingedients in his
special mix.
Nathan.
.
- References:
- Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: DaveR
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: nbaker2328
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: DaveR
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: nbaker2328
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: [Clax86list] Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: Charles Crayne
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: DaveR
- Re: [Clax86list] Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: Charles Crayne
- Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Next by Date: Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Previous by thread: Re: [Clax86list] Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Next by thread: Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Index(es):