Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: nbaker2328 <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:43:23 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 27, 8:08 am, Frank Kotler <spamt...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay, Dave. It appears that HLA does not wear a Red Hat. I am pretty
confident that NASM does, so you might give it a try:
http://nasm.sourceforge.net/
If Nasm had a fan club, I'd be president (maybe "maximum leader", even),
so I won't argue with that suggestion. However... Nasm isn't going to
correspond well with AoA, which is what David would like to do...
Nasm is an assembler isn't it? AoA teaches assembly, right?
It should be possible to convert most of the AoA examples to Nasm
source using the C library for the I/O stuff. Alternatively, one
could convert them directly to C code using inline assembly.
Nathan.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- References:
- Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: DaveR
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: nbaker2328
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: DaveR
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: nbaker2328
- Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- From: Frank Kotler
- Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Prev by Date: Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Next by Date: Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Next by thread: Re: Seg fault with hla 1.99 on Fedora 8 linux
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|