Re: referring to segment offsets in read address mode
- From: Brian Phillips <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:40:36 -0600
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:25:38 +0000, Frank Kotler wrote:
Brian Phillips wrote:
I had tucked this question into a stale thread at alt.lang.asm,
Stale? It was yesterday. You young people are so impatient! :)
Best,
Frank
I thought it was buried. In a.l.a, I usually see responses to my
questions before I post them. :) That's a compliment!
Young people??? Frank, I'll be 65 years old (in 25 years).
I'm going to have to print your answer and pour a cup of coffee. Thanks
for elaborating. At first reading, I'm still not sure why one label
declared in masm's uninitialized data gets translated by the assembler as
an offset from @data, while another declared label in the same BSS
section gets translated as an offset from _bss. Shouldn't they both be
translated as offsets from _bss? (or assembled to processor opcode
instructions and data, or "pcode" like you old-timers call it??).
It's very confusing to me when I put some labels in the bss section and
see that the disassembly of the code references to those labels (when
debugging) shows an offset from @data for one label, and an offset from
_bss for another.
--
Regards,
Pop Tart
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: referring to segment offsets in read address mode
- From: nbaker2328
- Re: referring to segment offsets in read address mode
- From: Frank Kotler
- Re: referring to segment offsets in read address mode
- Prev by Date: Identifying I/O related instructions
- Next by Date: Re: [Clax86list] Identifying I/O related instructions
- Previous by thread: Identifying I/O related instructions
- Next by thread: Re: referring to segment offsets in read address mode
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|