Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: João Jerónimo <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:36:11 +0000
Dirk Wolfgang Glomp wrote:
But if you write your own HD-driver, the physical CHS-limit is:But is this a DOS or a BIOS level driver?
16 heads, 255 sectors, 65536 tracks(cylinders), and this gives
us 267386880 sectors (= 127.5 GB).
So if the the hardware can handle it then it works almost like LBA28
(max= 128 GB), ...except for the unconvenient calculation needs.
If you write the driver for DOS it´s a DOS-driver, else if you write
it for your own OS maybe you can call it BIOS-driver?
Nop. But I don't know whether DOS can have it's own drivers to control HDs.
DOS usually calls the BIOS, so one can replace the BIOS HD driver and have
DOS call it, thinking it's the original BIOS driver.
Did you understand, or need more explaining?
JJ
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: Bob Masta
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- References:
- int 0x13 utility
- From: Alex Buell
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: João Jerónimo
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: Alex Buell
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: João Jerónimo
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: Wolfgang Kern
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: João Jerónimo
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: Dirk Wolfgang Glomp
- int 0x13 utility
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it possible to address more than 1MB in real-mode
- Next by Date: Re: int 0x13 utility
- Previous by thread: Re: int 0x13 utility
- Next by thread: Re: int 0x13 utility
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|