Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: "Rod Pemberton" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:45:39 -0400
"ArarghMail803NOSPAM" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:04auu3t4tqpd76bk9bh5807j1lvt4ssddj@xxxxxxxxxx
when I said "Correct", not about which kind of LBA support was in what
version. :-)
I didn't use Win95 much either. I'm still having a problem determining
specifically which Win95 version added LBA for FAT32. Most sources say
Win95b (since FDISK added support for partition type 0x0C), but some say
Win95c... I haven't been able to find a (reputable) source with version
numbers (e.g., 4.00.1111 or 4.03.1214, etc) that indicates which was the
first with LBA support for FAT32. Still working on tracking it down...
RP
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: Alex Buell
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: Alex Buell
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: ArarghMail803NOSPAM
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- References:
- int 0x13 utility
- From: Alex Buell
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: João Jerónimo
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: H. Peter Anvin
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: ArarghMail803NOSPAM
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: Rod Pemberton
- Re: int 0x13 utility
- From: ArarghMail803NOSPAM
- int 0x13 utility
- Prev by Date: Re: int 0x13 utility
- Next by Date: Re: int 0x13 utility
- Previous by thread: Re: int 0x13 utility
- Next by thread: Re: int 0x13 utility
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|