Re: 640x512x16bpp with VESA ?
- From: whygee <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 03:56:21 +0200
Bob Masta wrote:
I could maybe double a pixel in a line, but not on consecutive linesHow about doing those random accesses to an intermediate buffer set to
(or the software would slow down the already inefficient CPU).
So at least i need the doublescan feature.
the 640x512 size, then doing the doubling when you transfer it to the
display? Or maybe use a 1280x512 buffer and then just do the
double-scan during transfers.
If the data set could have fit into L2, that would have been an option.
However :
- The L2 size on VIA's C3 is ... small. Higher fab yields and lower costs have a price...
- At each time step, not all pixels are updated. So the bandwidth of
a huge data move would be ... wasted.
- the move must be performed by the CPU, which has other things to do :-/
- etc.
thanks anyway,
Best regards,
Bob Masta
DAQARTA v3.50
Data AcQuisition And Real-Time Analysis
www.daqarta.com
Scope, Spectrum, Spectrogram, FREE Signal Generator
Science with your sound card!
cool \o/
Do you also handle on-the-fly compression ?
yg
.
- References:
- 640x512x16bpp with VESA ?
- From: whygee
- Re: 640x512x16bpp with VESA ?
- From: Wolfgang Kern
- Re: 640x512x16bpp with VESA ?
- From: whygee
- Re: 640x512x16bpp with VESA ?
- From: Bob Masta
- 640x512x16bpp with VESA ?
- Prev by Date: Re: 640x512x16bpp with VESA ?
- Next by Date: Simulator for x486
- Previous by thread: Re: 640x512x16bpp with VESA ?
- Next by thread: HLA v1.102 is now available on Webster (added: MacOSX)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|