Re: Problem with Function Call with NASM
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:06:14 -0700
ArarghMail807NOSPAM wrote:
No. I would have, also. Maybe NASM keeps them in different
Do you know how I can receive better error reporting advice from
NASM? I would have expected a warning.
namespaces.
It sort of does (except for labels without preceeding colon), mainly to avoid the constant breakage when new instructions are added, especially common words like "pause".
If you are *deliberately* using a keyword as a label, you should prefix it with a $ sign.
-hpa
.
- References:
- Problem with Function Call with NASM
- From: bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Problem with Function Call with NASM
- From: ArarghMail807NOSPAM
- Re: Problem with Function Call with NASM
- From: bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Problem with Function Call with NASM
- From: ArarghMail807NOSPAM
- Problem with Function Call with NASM
- Prev by Date: Re: Disassembler questions
- Next by Date: Re: Atomic operations in 32 and 64 bit platforms
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem with Function Call with NASM
- Next by thread: Re: Problem with Function Call with NASM
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|