comp.lang.asm.x86

Date Index

Calling convention odd?, Qyz
- Re: Calling convention odd?, Robert Redelmeier
  - Re: Calling convention odd?, BGB / cr88192
- Re: Calling convention odd?, BGB / cr88192
  - Re: Calling convention odd?, Bob Masta
- Re: Calling convention odd?, Tim Roberts
  - Re: Calling convention odd?, ArarghMail912NOSPAM
    - Re: Calling convention odd?, James Harris
- Re: Calling convention odd?, Rod Pemberton
- Re: Calling convention odd?, wolfgang kern
learning assembly through HLA- help, asuchar
- Re: learning assembly through HLA- help, Frank Kotler
questions about x86, jogging
- Re: questions about x86, James Van Buskirk
- Re: questions about x86, BGB / cr88192
Valid operation?, Qyz
- Re: Valid operation?, Frank Kotler
- Re: Valid operation?, James Van Buskirk
- Re: Valid operation?, Rod Pemberton
Is MOVDQA possible in real mode (16 bit)?, Bernhard Schornak
- Re: Is MOVDQA possible in real mode (16 bit)?, wolfgang kern
  - Re: Is MOVDQA possible in real mode (16 bit)?, Bernhard Schornak
Simple Bootloader to Run C program, oraclerob
- Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, Tim Roberts
- Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, Alexei A. Frounze
  - Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, oraclerob
    - Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, Alexei A. Frounze
    - Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, oraclerob
    - Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, David
    - Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, Alexei A. Frounze
    - Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, dave
- Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, Rod Pemberton
  - Re: Simple Bootloader to Run C program, Jim Leonard
NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, oraclerob
- Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, Frank Kotler
  - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, oraclerob
  - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, oraclerob
    - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, oraclerob
    - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, James Van Buskirk
    - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, BGB / cr88192
    - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, James Harris
    - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, oraclerob
    - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, BGB / cr88192
    - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, oraclerob
    - Re: NASM on WINXP x64 creating EXE, David
Howto Push, Bernd Gerber
- Re: Howto Push, David
  - Re: Howto Push, Alexei A. Frounze
- Re: Howto Push, Frank Kotler
- Re: Howto Push, Tim Roberts
HLA Floating Point opcodes, Richard Russell
- Re: HLA Floating Point opcodes, Nathan Baker
- Re: HLA Floating Point opcodes, Nathan Baker
  - Re: HLA Floating Point opcodes, Richard Russell
    - Re: HLA Floating Point opcodes, Nathan Baker
    - Re: HLA Floating Point opcodes, James Harris
    - Re: HLA Floating Point opcodes, Richard Russell
Memory problem, bartc
- Re: Memory problem, James Harris
- Re: Memory problem, Rod Pemberton
  - Re: Memory problem, bartc
- Re: Memory problem, wolfgang kern
- Re: Memory problem, gil_johnson
- Re: Memory problem, bartc
- Re: Memory problem, Bernhard Schornak
  - Re: Memory problem, Tim Roberts
    - Re: Memory problem, Bernhard Schornak
    - Re: Memory problem, bartc
    - Re: Memory problem, James Harris
    - Re: Memory problem, bartc
    - Re: Memory problem, James Harris
    - Re: Memory problem, bartc
    - Re: Memory problem, ArarghMail912NOSPAM
    - Re: Memory problem, Bernhard Schornak
    - Re: Memory problem, Helge Kruse
    - Re: Memory problem, Bernhard Schornak
    - Re: Memory problem, Amoss
    - Re: Memory problem, Bernhard Schornak
    - Re: Memory problem, James Harris
allocating memory, JohnSmith
- Re: allocating memory, Maurizio Vitale
  - Re: allocating memory, Robert Redelmeier
    - Re: allocating memory, Maurizio Vitale
    - Re: allocating memory, Robert Redelmeier
    - Re: allocating memory, James Harris
    - Re: allocating memory, BGB / cr88192
    - Re: allocating memory, Tim Roberts
  - Re: allocating memory, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: allocating memory, Robert Redelmeier
learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, bpascal123
- Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, Alexei A. Frounze
- Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, James Harris
  - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, Nathan Baker
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, bpascal123
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, James Harris
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, Nathan
  - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, bpascal123
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, H. Peter Anvin
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, James Harris
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, bpascal123
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, bpascal123
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, Frank Kotler
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, James Harris
    - Re: learning assembly with very basic computer knowledge, bpascal123
call instruction, JohnSmith
- Re: call instruction, Rod Pemberton
- Re: call instruction, BGB / cr88192
  - Re: call instruction, JohnSmith
    - Re: call instruction, Tim Roberts
    - Re: call instruction, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
    - Re: call instruction, BGB / cr88192
    - Re: call instruction, JohnSmith
    - Re: call instruction, BGB / cr88192
testing 1 2 3, Nathan
- Re: testing 1 2 3, Nathan
  - Re: testing 1 2 3, Nathan Baker
  - Re: testing 1 2 3, Nathan
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, Jim Carlock
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, Jim Carlock
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, Jim Carlock
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, pete
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, Alexei A. Frounze
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, Nathan Baker
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, pete
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, Alexei A. Frounze
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, Nathan Baker
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, ArarghMail912NOSPAM
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, James Harris
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, ArarghMail912NOSPAM
    - Re: testing 1 2 3, Nathan Baker
biew-6.1.0 has been released, Nickols_K
Failing Bootloader code, Darren Gansberg
- Re: Failing Bootloader code, Frank Kotler
  - Re: Failing Bootloader code, Darren Gansberg
- Re: Failing Bootloader code, Nathan Baker
  - Re: Failing Bootloader code, Darren Gansberg
- Re: Failing Bootloader code, Rod Pemberton
  - Re: Failing Bootloader code, Darren Gansberg
- Re: Failing Bootloader code, s_dubrovich
[ANN] MikeOS 4.0 converted to 32 bit protected mode, news.aioe.org
process mapping, JohnSmith
- Re: process mapping, Alexei A. Frounze
- Re: process mapping, Maurizio Vitale
- Re: process mapping, James Harris
  - Re: process mapping, JohnSmith
    - Re: process mapping, James Harris
    - Re: process mapping, Maurizio Vitale
    - Re: process mapping, JohnSmith
comp.lang.asm.x86 FAQ, Jim Carlock
Why the underbar?, A
- Re: Why the underbar?, H. Peter Anvin
  - Re: Why the underbar?, Jim Carlock
    - Re: Why the underbar?, s_dubrovich
  - Re: Why the underbar?, cac
  - Re: Why the underbar?, BGB / cr88192
Wondering about INT 33h ... Questions, wolf3y3
- Re: Wondering about INT 33h ... Questions, wolfgang kern
- Re: Wondering about INT 33h ... Questions, Rod Pemberton
  - Re: Wondering about INT 33h ... Questions, wolf3y3
    - Re: Wondering about INT 33h ... Questions, Jim Leonard
Re: NOP vs XCHG AX,AX, BGB / cr88192
Re: linear adr to physical addr, Tim Roberts
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: linear adr to physical addr, Alexei A. Frounze
  - Re: linear adr to physical addr, Dick Wesseling
    - Re: linear adr to physical addr, peter
- Re: linear adr to physical addr, BGB / cr88192
Re: which assembler, Tim Roberts
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: which assembler, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: which assembler, Steve
  - Re: which assembler, ArarghMail912NOSPAM
    - Re: which assembler, hutch--