Re: 2-dimensional arrays and functions
From: Irrwahn Grausewitz (irrwahn33_at_freenet.de)
Date: 10/30/03
- Next message: Irrwahn Grausewitz: "Re: 0.1 = 0 ???"
- Previous message: smith flyers: "function x call function y call funtion x again ..."
- In reply to: ellie fant: "Re: 2-dimensional arrays and functions"
- Next in thread: B. v Ingen Schenau: "Re: 2-dimensional arrays and functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:01:40 +0100
"ellie fant" <pcrcutitout1000011@uko2.co.uk> wrote:
<code snipped>
>hope this helps
Nope. It's a totally different matter: no dynamic allocation, no
functions returning memory adresses. Completely different.
Now *you* get things sorted.
You want to learn the hard way? Do it. But I doubt you'll be able to
do any serious programming in the near future. And please stay away
from giving bad advice to other posters meanwhile.
Good luck to you. You're in a need.
-- Irrwahn (irrwahn33@freenet.de)
- Next message: Irrwahn Grausewitz: "Re: 0.1 = 0 ???"
- Previous message: smith flyers: "function x call function y call funtion x again ..."
- In reply to: ellie fant: "Re: 2-dimensional arrays and functions"
- Next in thread: B. v Ingen Schenau: "Re: 2-dimensional arrays and functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]