Re: Objects
From: jeffc (nobody_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 11/06/03
- Next message: jeffc: "Re: Objects"
- Previous message: Someone: "Re: Try on that package from the Microsoft Corp."
- In reply to: Robert Fortune: "Re: Objects"
- Next in thread: Chris \( Val \): "Re: Objects"
- Reply: Chris \( Val \): "Re: Objects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:38:13 -0500
"Robert Fortune" <catlike1@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:tipqb.12512$9M3.7696@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> "A Class enables you to encapsulate, or bundle, these
> various parts and various functions into one collection, which is called
an
> object."
>
> He seems to be saying that a collection of data members
> and related functions is an object as well as a class.
That is misleading at best, and wrong at worst.
- Next message: jeffc: "Re: Objects"
- Previous message: Someone: "Re: Try on that package from the Microsoft Corp."
- In reply to: Robert Fortune: "Re: Objects"
- Next in thread: Chris \( Val \): "Re: Objects"
- Reply: Chris \( Val \): "Re: Objects"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]