Re: Objects

From: André Pönitz (poenitz_at_gmx.net)
Date: 11/07/03 

Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 09:14:10 +0000 (UTC)

Robert Fortune <catlike1@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Are you refering to the second one?
>
> It's neither. Both reviews are of books that are from around
> 1998. The book I have is the 4th Edition first published in 2001. The
> reviews you cited are not up to date. I checked
> the ISBN numbers and they are different from the book I have here.

I see. Sorry for the confusion.

Andre'

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dream list
    ... > Carrie wrote: ... I have read several reviews in digital ... Epson make the best scanners in this or ... There are 31 books in the Discworld ...
    (microsoft.public.publisher)
  • Re: Can you say libel?
    ... > At one time I considered purchasing one of Lonnie's books. ... > my mind when I noticed that his girlfriend Chine Challis reviewed ... > reviews about the books he's written. ... Sorry, I'm not BUFU. ...
    (rec.backcountry)
  • Re: Book sales, Schiller, and USCF
    ... Pandolfini's books are very popular in the ... > Yes - I would agree that IF there was a standard of minimal qualifications ... Regardless of book reviews. ... Most of these Chessvile reviewers, to judge by a recent reading of the ...
    (rec.games.chess.misc)
  • Re: Lovely Spam
    ... Web site and post snippets from it to damage a writer's reputation without ... chock full of reviews like these" and followed with the "reviews," you ... find the truth so I can write books based on facts, ... You posted quotes that you've admitted having ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: More fun with plagiarism
    ... like reviewing your own books or sock-puppetting your own opinions. ... Mary Rosh online persona ... it was suggested that Lott had created and used "Mary ... reviews of his books on Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble in violation ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)